Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38243402›Full record

SynthesisAge and ageing2024

What are the priorities for research of older people living in their own home, including those living with frailty? A systematic review and content analysis of studies reporting older people's priorities and unmet needs.

Liz Graham, Caroline Brundle, Nicola Harrison, Deirdre Andre, Andrew Clegg, Anne Forster, Karen Spilsbury

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Age and ageing, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Can Care Coordination for Multiple Long-Term Conditions Be Meaningfully Measured Using Routine Data? A Multi-Stage Consultation.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Liz GrahamAcademic Unit for Ageing and Stroke Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust/University of Leeds, Bradford, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4276-1257
Caroline BrundleAcademic Unit for Ageing and Stroke Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK.
Nicola HarrisonAcademic Unit for Ageing and Stroke Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK.
Deirdre AndreLibrary Services, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Andrew CleggAcademic Unit for Ageing and Stroke Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust/University of Leeds, Bradford, UK.
Anne ForsterAcademic Unit for Ageing and Stroke Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust/University of Leeds, Bradford, UK.
Karen SpilsburySchool of Healthcare, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6908-0032
University of Leeds · GBBradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

Department of Health and Social CareNational Institute for Health and Care Research Yorkshire & Humber Applied Research Collaboration
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is limited evidence regarding the needs of older people, including those living with frailty, to inform research priority setting.

objectivesThis systematic review aimed to identify the range of research priorities of community-dwelling older people living in their own home, including those living with frailty.

methodsIncluded studies were from economically developed countries and designed to identify the priorities for research or unmet needs of community-dwelling older people. Studies were excluded if they described priorities relating to specific health conditions. Medline, Embase, PsycInfo and CINAHL were searched (January 2010-June 2022), alongside grey literature. Study quality was assessed, but studies were not excluded on the basis of quality. A bespoke data extraction form was used and content analysis undertaken to synthesise findings.

resultsSeventy-five reports were included. Seven explicitly aimed to identify the priorities or unmet needs of frail older people; 68 did not specify frailty as a characteristic. Study designs varied, including priority setting exercises, surveys, interviews, focus groups and literature reviews. Identified priorities and unmet needs were organised into themes: prevention and management, improving health and care service provision, improving daily life, meeting carers' needs and planning ahead. DISCUSSION: Many priority areas were raised by older people, carers and health/care professionals, but few were identified explicitly by/for frail older people. An overarching need was identified for tailored, collaborative provision of care and support.

conclusionReview findings provide a valuable resource for researchers and health/care staff wishing to focus their research or service provision on areas of importance for older people.

Indexed as

FrailtyAgedCaregiversFocus GroupsFrail ElderlyHumansIndependent Livingfrailtyolder peopleresearch prioritiesunmet needs

Identifiers

PMID38243402
PMCPMC10798941
OpenAlexW4391041838

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.