Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38243340›Full record

ArticleJournal of translational medicine2024

Multi-omics integration with weighted affinity and self-diffusion applied for cancer subtypes identification.

Xin Duan, Xinnan Ding, Zhuanzhe Zhao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Xin DuanSchool of Artificial Intelligence, Anhui Polytechnic University, Wuhu, 241000, China. duanx@ahpu.edu.cn.
Xinnan DingCollege of Electrical Engineering, Anhui Polytechnic University, Wuhu, 241000, China.
Zhuanzhe ZhaoSchool of Artificial Intelligence, Anhui Polytechnic University, Wuhu, 241000, China.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 82203192
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCharacterizing cancer molecular subtypes is crucial for improving prognosis and individualized treatment. Integrative analysis of multi-omics data has become an important approach for disease subtyping, yielding better understanding of the complex biology. Current multi-omics integration tools and methods for cancer subtyping often suffer challenges of high computational efficiency as well as the problem of weight assignment on data types.

resultsHere, we present an efficient multi-omics integration via weighted affinity and self-diffusion (MOSD) to dissect cancer heterogeneity. MOSD first construct local scaling affinity on each data type and then integrate all affinities by weighted linear combination, followed by the self-diffusion to further improve the patients' similarities for the downstream clustering analysis. To demonstrate the effectiveness and usefulness for cancer subtyping, we apply MOSD across ten cancer types with three measurements (Gene expression, DNA methylation, miRNA).

conclusionsOur approach exhibits more significant differences in patient survival and computationally efficient benchmarking against several state-of-art integration methods and the identified molecular subtypes reveal strongly biological interpretability. The code as well as its implementation are available in GitHub: https://github.com/DXCODEE/MOSD .

Indexed as

MicroRNAsNeoplasmsAlgorithmsCluster AnalysisDNA MethylationHumansMultiomicsPrognosisMicroRNAsCancer heterogeneityMuti-omicsSelf-diffusionWeighted affinity

Identifiers

PMID38243340
PMCPMC10799401

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.