Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38243339›Full record

ArticleCancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society2024

Contrast-enhanced CT radiomics features to preoperatively identify differences between tumor and proximal tumor-adjacent and tumor-distant tissues of resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Dan Gao, Bang-Guo Tan, Xiao-Qian Chen, Chuanqinyuan Zhou, Jing Ou, Wen-Wen Guo, Hai-Ying Zhou, Rui Li, Xiao-Ming Zhang, Tian-Wu Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Dan GaoMedical Imaging Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, and Department of Radiology, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, 1# Maoyuan South Road, Shunqing District, Nanchong, 637000, Sichuan, China.
Bang-Guo TanMedical Imaging Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, and Department of Radiology, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, 1# Maoyuan South Road, Shunqing District, Nanchong, 637000, Sichuan, China.
Xiao-Qian ChenMedical Imaging Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, and Department of Radiology, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, 1# Maoyuan South Road, Shunqing District, Nanchong, 637000, Sichuan, China.
Chuanqinyuan ZhouMedical Imaging Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, and Department of Radiology, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, 1# Maoyuan South Road, Shunqing District, Nanchong, 637000, Sichuan, China.
Jing OuMedical Imaging Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, and Department of Radiology, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, 1# Maoyuan South Road, Shunqing District, Nanchong, 637000, Sichuan, China.
Wen-Wen GuoMedical Imaging Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, and Department of Radiology, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, 1# Maoyuan South Road, Shunqing District, Nanchong, 637000, Sichuan, China.
Hai-Ying ZhouMedical Imaging Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, and Department of Radiology, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, 1# Maoyuan South Road, Shunqing District, Nanchong, 637000, Sichuan, China.
Rui LiMedical Imaging Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, and Department of Radiology, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, 1# Maoyuan South Road, Shunqing District, Nanchong, 637000, Sichuan, China.
Xiao-Ming ZhangMedical Imaging Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, and Department of Radiology, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, 1# Maoyuan South Road, Shunqing District, Nanchong, 637000, Sichuan, China.
Tian-Wu ChenDepartment of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, 74# Linjiang Rd, Yuzhong District, Chongqing, 400010, China. tianwuchen_nsmc@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5776-3429

Funding

Nanchong-University Cooperative Research Project 20SXQT0329National Natural Science Foundation of China 82271959
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEsophagectomy is the main treatment for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), and patients with histopathologically negative margins still have a relatively higher recurrence rate. Contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) radiomics might noninvasively obtain potential information about the internal heterogeneity of ESCC and its adjacent tissues. This study aimed to develop CECT radiomics models to preoperatively identify the differences between tumor and proximal tumor-adjacent and tumor-distant tissues in ESCC to potentially reduce tumor recurrence.

methodsA total of 529 consecutive patients with ESCC from Centers A (n = 447) and B (n = 82) undergoing preoperative CECT were retrospectively enrolled in this study. Radiomics features of the tumor, proximal tumor-adjacent (PTA) and proximal tumor-distant (PTD) tissues were individually extracted by delineating the corresponding region of interest (ROI) on CECT and applying the 3D-Slicer radiomics module. Patients with pairwise tissues (ESCC vs. PTA, ESCC vs. PTD, and PTA vs. PTD) from Center A were randomly assigned to the training cohort (TC, n = 313) and internal validation cohort (IVC, n = 134). Univariate analysis and the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator were used to select the core radiomics features, and logistic regression was performed to develop radiomics models to differentiate individual pairwise tissues in TC, validated in IVC and the external validation cohort (EVC) from Center B. Diagnostic performance was assessed using area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) and accuracy.

resultsWith the chosen 20, 19 and 5 core radiomics features in TC, 3 individual radiomics models were developed, which exhibited excellent ability to differentiate the tumor from PTA tissue (AUC: 0.965; accuracy: 0.965), the tumor from PTD tissue (AUC: 0.991; accuracy: 0.958), and PTA from PTD tissue (AUC: 0.870; accuracy: 0.848), respectively. In IVC and EVC, the models also showed good performance in differentiating the tumor from PTA tissue (AUCs: 0.956 and 0.962; accuracy: 0.956 and 0.937), the tumor from PTD tissue (AUCs: 0.990 and 0.974; accuracy: 0.952 and 0.970), and PTA from PTD tissue (AUCs: 0.806 and 0.786; accuracy: 0.760 and 0.786), respectively.

conclusionCECT radiomics models could differentiate the tumor from PTA tissue, the tumor from PTD tissue, and PTA from PTD tissue in ESCC.

Indexed as

Esophageal NeoplasmsEsophageal Squamous Cell CarcinomaHumansRadiomicsRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray ComputedEsophagusSquamous cell carcinomaTomographyTumor-adjacent tissueTumor-distant tissueX-ray computed

Identifiers

PMID38243339
PMCPMC10797955

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.