ArticleBMC medical imaging2024
Study on the diagnostic value of MDCT extramural vascular invasion in preoperative N staging of gastric cancer patients.
Article in BMC medical imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Computed tomography staging of colon cancer: improved patient selection for neoadjuvant therapy with combined radiologic tumor and nodal staging.BMC cancer · 2026Article
- Harnessing the machine learning and nomogram models: elevating prognostication in nonmetastatic gastric cancer with "double invasion" for personalized patient care.European journal of medical research · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTo explore the diagnostic value of multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) extramural vascular invasion (EMVI) in preoperative N Staging of gastric cancer patients.
methodsAccording to the MR-defined EMVI scoring standard of rectal cancer, we developed a 5-point scale scoring system to evaluate the status of CT-detected extramural vascular invasion(ctEMVI), 0-2 points were ctEMVI-negative status, and 3-4 points were positive status for ctEMVI. Patients were divided into ctEMVI positive group and ctEMVI negative group. The correlation between ctEMVI and clinical features was analyzed. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of ctEMVI for pathological metastatic lymph nodes and N staging, The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of pathological N staging using ctEMVI and short-axis diameter were generated and compared.
resultsThe occurrence rate of lymphovascular invasion (LVI) and proportion of tumors with a greatest diameter > 6 cm in the ctEMVI positive group was higher than that in the ctEMVI negative group (P < 0.05). Spearman correlation analysis showed a positive correlation between ctEMVI and LVI, N stage, and tumor size (P < 0.05). For ctEMVI scores ≥ 3,The AUC of ctEMVI for diagnosing lymph node metastasis, N stage ≥ N2, and N3 stage were 0.857, 0.802, and 0.758, respectively. The sensitivity, NPV and accuracy of ctEMVI for diagnosing N stage ≥ N2 were superior to those of short-axis diameter (P < 0.05), while sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy of ctEMVI for diagnosing N3 stage were superior to those of short-axis diameter (P < 0.05).
conclusionctEMVI has important value in diagnosing metastatic lymph nodes and advanced N staging. As an important imaging marker, ctEMVI can be included in the preoperative imaging evaluation of patients, providing important assistance for clinical guidance and treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.