Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38243215›Full record

ArticleBMC medical imaging2024

A hybrid deep CNN model for brain tumor image multi-classification.

Saravanan Srinivasan, Divya Francis, Sandeep Kumar Mathivanan, Hariharan Rajadurai, Basu Dev Shivahare, Mohd Asif Shah

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Convolutional Neural Networks in Radiology: Principles, Clinical Applications, and a Practical Framework for Radiologists.Medical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Saravanan SrinivasanDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Vel Tech Rangarajan Dr.Sagunthala R&D Institute of Science and Technology, Chennai, 600062, India.
Divya FrancisDepartment of Electronics and Communication Engineering, PSNA College of Engineering and Technology, Dindigul, 624622, India.
Sandeep Kumar MathivananSchool of Computing Science and Engineering, Galgotias University, Greater Noida, 203201, India.
Hariharan RajaduraiSchool of Computing Science and Engineering, VIT Bhopal University, Bhopal-Indore Highway Kothrikalan, Sehore, 466114, India.
Basu Dev ShivahareSchool of Computing Science and Engineering, Galgotias University, Greater Noida, 203201, India.
Mohd Asif ShahDepartment of Economics, Kabridahar University, Po Box 250, Kebri Dehar, Ethiopia. drmohdasifshah@kdu.edu.et.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The current approach to diagnosing and classifying brain tumors relies on the histological evaluation of biopsy samples, which is invasive, time-consuming, and susceptible to manual errors. These limitations underscore the pressing need for a fully automated, deep-learning-based multi-classification system for brain malignancies. This article aims to leverage a deep convolutional neural network (CNN) to enhance early detection and presents three distinct CNN models designed for different types of classification tasks. The first CNN model achieves an impressive detection accuracy of 99.53% for brain tumors. The second CNN model, with an accuracy of 93.81%, proficiently categorizes brain tumors into five distinct types: normal, glioma, meningioma, pituitary, and metastatic. Furthermore, the third CNN model demonstrates an accuracy of 98.56% in accurately classifying brain tumors into their different grades. To ensure optimal performance, a grid search optimization approach is employed to automatically fine-tune all the relevant hyperparameters of the CNN models. The utilization of large, publicly accessible clinical datasets results in robust and reliable classification outcomes. This article conducts a comprehensive comparison of the proposed models against classical models, such as AlexNet, DenseNet121, ResNet-101, VGG-19, and GoogleNet, reaffirming the superiority of the deep CNN-based approach in advancing the field of brain tumor classification and early detection.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsGliomaMeningeal NeoplasmsBrainHumansNeural Networks, ComputerBrain tumor gradingGrid searchHybrid convolutional neural networkHybrid deep learningHyperparameters

Identifiers

PMID38243215
PMCPMC10799524

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.