Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38243193›Full record

ArticleGenetics, selection, evolution : GSE2024

The potential of microbiota information to better predict efficiency traits in growing pigs fed a conventional and a high-fiber diet.

Vanille Déru, Francesco Tiezzi, Céline Carillier-Jacquin, Benoit Blanchet, Laurent Cauquil, Olivier Zemb, Alban Bouquet, Christian Maltecca, Hélène Gilbert

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Vanille DéruGenPhySE, INRAE, ENVT, Université de Toulouse, Castanet-Tolosan, France. vanille.deru@purpan.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1722-5698
Francesco TiezziDepartment of Agriculture, Food, Environment and Forestry, University of Florence, 50144, Florence, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4358-9236
Céline Carillier-JacquinGenPhySE, INRAE, ENVT, Université de Toulouse, Castanet-Tolosan, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9756-2645
Benoit BlanchetUE3P, INRAE, Domaine de la Prise, 35590, Saint-Gilles, France.
Laurent CauquilGenPhySE, INRAE, ENVT, Université de Toulouse, Castanet-Tolosan, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0384-8811
Olivier ZembGenPhySE, INRAE, ENVT, Université de Toulouse, Castanet-Tolosan, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3900-5522
Alban BouquetIFIP-Institut du Porc, 35651, Le Rheu Cedex, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5567-7284
Christian MalteccaDepartment of Animal Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9996-4680
Hélène GilbertGenPhySE, INRAE, ENVT, Université de Toulouse, Castanet-Tolosan, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4385-3228
École Nationale Vétérinaire de Toulouse · FRInstitut du Porc · FRInstitut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement · FRNorth Carolina State University · USUniversity of Florence · IT

Funding

H2020 Feed-a-Gene project 633531MicroFeed Project ANR-16-CE20-0003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImproving pigs' ability to digest diets with an increased dietary fiber content is a lever to improve feed efficiency and limit feed costs in pig production. The aim of this study was to determine whether information on the gut microbiota and host genetics can contribute to predict digestive efficiency (DE, i.e. digestibility coefficients of energy, organic matter, and nitrogen), feed efficiency (FE, i.e. feed conversion ratio and residual feed intake), average daily gain, and daily feed intake phenotypes. Data were available for 1082 pigs fed a conventional or high-fiber diet. Fecal samples were collected at 16 weeks, and DE was estimated using near‑infrared spectrometry. A cross-validation approach was used to predict traits within the same diet, for the opposite diet, and for a combination of both diets, by implementing three models, i.e. with only genomic (Gen), only microbiota (Micro), and both genomic and microbiota information (Micro+Gen). The predictive ability with and without sharing common sires and breeding environment was also evaluated. Prediction accuracy of the phenotypes was calculated as the correlation between model prediction and phenotype adjusted for fixed effects.

resultsPrediction accuracies of the three models were low to moderate (< 0.47) for growth and FE traits and not significantly different between models. In contrast, for DE traits, prediction accuracies of model Gen were low (< 0.30) and those of models Micro and Micro+Gen were moderate to high (> 0.52). Prediction accuracies were not affected by the stratification of diets in the reference and validation sets and were in the same order of magnitude within the same diet, for the opposite diet, and for the combination of both diets. Prediction accuracies of the three models were significantly higher when pigs in the reference and validation populations shared common sires and breeding environment than when they did not (P < 0.001).

conclusionsThe microbiota is a relevant source of information to predict DE regardless of the diet, but not to predict growth and FE traits for which prediction accuracies were similar to those obtained with genomic information only. Further analyses on larger datasets and more diverse diets should be carried out to complement and consolidate these results.

Indexed as

DietMicrobiotaAnimal FeedAnimalsEatingGenomePhenotypeSwine

Identifiers

PMID38243193
PMCPMC10797989
OpenAlexW4391032284

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.