Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38243105›Full record

SynthesisPaediatric drugs2024

Use of Computerized Physician Order Entry with Clinical Decision Support to Prevent Dose Errors in Pediatric Medication Orders: A Systematic Review.

Henna Ruutiainen, Anna-Riia Holmström, Eva Kunnola, Sini Kuitunen

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Paediatric drugs, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Preventing Medication Errors in Paediatrics: A Narrative Review.Clinical medicine insights. Pediatrics · 2026
    Review
  5. Drug-related problems and their predictors in pediatric community-acquired infections: the role of pharmacist-led interventions in Pakistan.Journal of pharmacy & pharmaceutical sciences : a publication of the Canadian Society for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Societe canadienne des sciences pharmaceutiques · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Henna RuutiainenDivision of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Helsinki, Viikinkaari 5 E, PL 56, 00014, Helsinki, Finland. henna.ruutiainen@helsinki.fi.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2184-3088
Anna-Riia HolmströmDivision of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Helsinki, Viikinkaari 5 E, PL 56, 00014, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3908-5430
Eva KunnolaDivision of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Helsinki, Viikinkaari 5 E, PL 56, 00014, Helsinki, Finland.
Sini KuitunenHUS Pharmacy, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0170-892X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrescribing is a high-risk task within the pediatric medication-use process and requires defenses to prevent errors. Such system-centric defenses include electronic health record systems with computerized physician order entry (CPOE) and clinical decision support (CDS) tools that assist safe prescribing. The objective of this study was to examine the effects of CPOE systems with CDS functions in preventing dose errors in pediatric medication orders. MATERIAL AND

methodsThis study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 criteria and Synthesis Without Meta-Analysis (SWiM) items. The study protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42021277413). The final literature search on MEDLINE (Ovid), Scopus, Web of Science, and EMB Reviews was conducted on 10 September 2023. Only peer-reviewed studies considering both CPOE and CDS systems in pediatric inpatient or outpatient settings were included. Study selection, data extraction, and evidence quality assessment (JBI critical appraisal tool assessment and GRADE approach) were carried out by two individual reviewers. Vote counting method was used to evaluate the effects of CPOE-CDS systems on dose errors rates.

resultsA total of 17 studies published in 2007-2021 met the inclusion criteria. The most used CDS tools were dose range check (n = 14), dose calculator (n = 8), and dosing frequency check (n = 8). Alerts were recorded in 15 studies. A statistically significant reduction in dose errors was found in eight studies, whereas an increase of dose errors was not reported.

conclusionsThe CPOE-CDS systems have the potential to reduce pediatric dose errors. Most beneficial interventions seem to be system customization, implementing CDS alerts, and the use of dose range check. While human factors are still present within the medication use process, further studies and development activities are needed to optimize the usability of CPOE-CDS systems.

Indexed as

Decision Support Systems, ClinicalMedical Order Entry SystemsMedication ErrorsChildHumansPediatrics

Identifiers

PMID38243105
PMCPMC10891203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.