Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38242892›Full record

ReviewNPJ breast cancer2024

Selection of appropriate biomarkers to monitor effectiveness of ovarian function suppression in pre-menopausal patients with ER+ breast cancer.

Kelly E McCann, Shari B Goldfarb, Tiffany A Traina, Meredith M Regan, Neelima Vidula, Virginia Kaklamani

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in NPJ breast cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Kelly E McCannUniversity of California Los Angeles Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA.
Shari B GoldfarbMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
Tiffany A TrainaMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3597-0050
Meredith M ReganDana Farber Cancer Institute / Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
Neelima VidulaMassachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5963-7052
Virginia KaklamaniUniversity of Texas Health Sciences Center San Antonio / MD Anderson Cancer Center, San Antonio, TX, 78229, USA. kaklamani@uthscsa.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3313-8458
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USHarvard University · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Use of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists has been widely adopted to provide reversible ovarian function suppression for pre-menopausal breast cancer patients who are also receiving aromatase inhibitor or tamoxifen therapy based on results of 25 randomized trials representing almost 15,000 women demonstrating a survival benefit with this approach. Past clinical trials designed to establish the efficacy of GnRH agonists have monitored testosterone in the prostate cancer setting and estradiol in the breast cancer setting. We explore the merits of various biomarkers including estradiol, follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), and luteinizing hormone (LH) and their utility for informing GnRH agonist treatment decisions in breast cancer. Estradiol remains our biomarker of choice in ensuring adequate ovarian function suppression with GnRH agonist therapy among pre-menopausal women with breast cancer. We recommend future trials to continue to focus on estradiol levels as the primary endpoint, as they have in the past.

Identifiers

PMID38242892
PMCPMC10798954
OpenAlexW4391022975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.