Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38242720›Full record

Trial reportJournal for immunotherapy of cancer2024

Ipilimumab and nivolumab combined with anthracycline-based chemotherapy in metastatic hormone receptor-positive breast cancer: a randomized phase 2b trial.

Nikolai Kragøe Andresen, Andreas Hagen Røssevold, Claire Quaghebeur, Bjørnar Gilje, Beate Boge, Andrea Gombos, Ragnhild Sørum Falk, Randi R Mathiesen, Lars Julsrud, Øystein Garred and 7 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal for immunotherapy of cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03409198 (A Randomized Phase IIb Study Evaluating Immunogenic Chemotherapy Combined With Ipilimumab and Nivolumab in Patients With Metastatic Hormone Reseptor Positive Breast Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03409198 phase2completednot on this map

A Randomized Phase IIb Study Evaluating Immunogenic Chemotherapy Combined With Ipilimumab and Nivolumab in Patients With Metastatic Hormone Reseptor Positive Breast Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorOslo University HospitalRan2018 to 2022Enrolled82ConditionsBreast Cancer, Hormone Receptor Positive Tumor, Metastatic Breast CancerArmsIpilimumab, Nivolumab, Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, Cyclophosphamide
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Evaluation of targeted and immune combination therapies in a rat model of hormone receptor-positive breast cancer.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Breast cancer: pathogenesis and treatments.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2025
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Nikolai Kragøe AndresenDepartment of Clinical Cancer Research and Department of Cancer Immunology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-9386-1368
Andreas Hagen RøssevoldDepartment of Clinical Cancer Research and Department of Cancer Immunology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-7212-0111
Claire QuaghebeurDepartment of Oncology, CHU UCL Namur - Site Sainte-Elisabeth, Namur, Belgium.
Bjørnar GiljeDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.
Beate BogeCenter for Cancer Treatment, Sørlandet Hospital Kristiansand, Kristiansand, Norway.
Andrea GombosDepartment of Medical Oncology, Institut Jules Bordet, Bruxelles, Belgium.
Ragnhild Sørum FalkOslo Centre for Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Randi R MathiesenDepartment of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Lars JulsrudDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Øystein GarredDepartment of Pathology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Hege G RussnesInstitute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Ragnhild Reehorst LereimDepartment of Cancer Immunology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Sudhir Kumar ChauhanDepartment of Cancer Immunology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Ole Christian LingjærdeDepartment of Cancer Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Claire DunnDepartment of Cancer Immunology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Bjørn NaumeInstitute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Jon Amund KyteDepartment of Clinical Cancer Research and Department of Cancer Immunology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway jonky@ous-hf.no.ORCID 0000-0002-2854-3694
Oslo University Hospital · NOCHU Dinant Godinne UCL Namur · BEInstitut Jules Bordet · BESørlandet Sykehus · NOStavanger University Hospital · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitors have shown minimal clinical activity in hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer (HR

methodsPatients with HR

resultsEighty-two patients were randomized and received immune-chemo (N=49) or chemo-only (N=33), 16 patients continued to the ipi/nivo-only cross-over arm. Median follow-up was 41.4 months. Serious adverse events occurred in 63% in the immune-chemo arm, 39% in the chemo-only arm and 31% in the cross-over-arm. In the PP population (N=78) median PFS in the immune-chemo arm was 5.1 months, compared with 3.6 months in the chemo-only arm, with HR 0.94 (95% CI 0.59 to 1.51). Clinical benefit rates were 55% (26/47) and 48% (15/31) in the immune-chemo and chemo-only arms, respectively. In the cross-over-arm (ipi/nivo-only), objective responses were observed in 19% of patients (3/16) and clinical benefit in 25% (4/16). Treg levels in blood decreased after study chemotherapy. High-grade immune-related adverse events were associated with prolonged PFS. PD-L1 status and mutational burden were not associated with ipi/nivo benefit, whereas a numerical PFS advantage was observed for patients with a high Treg gene signature in tumor.

conclusionThe addition of ipi/nivo to chemotherapy increased toxicity without improving efficacy. Ipi/nivo administered sequentially to chemotherapy was tolerable and induced clinical responses. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03409198.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsNivolumabAnthracyclinesAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsB7-H1 AntigenCyclophosphamideFemaleHumansIpilimumabAnthracyclinesB7-H1 AntigenCyclophosphamideIpilimumabNivolumabBreast NeoplasmsImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsIpilimumabNivolumabT-Lymphocytes, Regulatory

Identifiers

PMID38242720
PMCPMC10806573
OpenAlexW4391042152

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.