ArticleBMJ case reports2024
Biphasic synovial sarcoma with epithelial predominance reminiscent of adenocarcinoma: a diagnostic challenge.
Article in BMJ case reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- The molecular conversations of sarcomas: exosomal non-coding RNAs in tumor's biology and their translational prospects.Molecular cancer · 2024Review
- Monophasic Synovial Sarcoma in an Adolescent: A Great Mimicker of Benign Pathology.Journal of Indian Association of Pediatric SurgeonsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Synovial sarcoma (SS) is a rare tumour of unknown origin with peak incidence between 10 and 35 years. Although it arises in juxta-articular location, SS is a misnomer and has no true relationship with synovium. In this case report, we present an elderly female patient with a long-standing history of thigh mass which was initially misdiagnosed as metastatic adenocarcinoma deposits on fine needle aspiration cytology, and again misdiagnosed as malignant adnexal skin tumour on core needle biopsy and referred for further management. Here, we discuss the challenges faced in the diagnosis of SS on a small biopsy and ways to differentiate it from other morphological mimickers. Therefore, we aim to increase the awareness of soft tissue tumours that microscopically appear like adenocarcinoma, which is a potential diagnostic pitfall. We also highlight the importance of morphological diagnosis and the utility of molecular testing using fluorescence in situ hybridisation, to arrive at the correct diagnosis of SS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.