Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38242690›Full record

ArticleeNeuro2024

A Semi-supervised Pipeline for Accurate Neuron Segmentation with Fewer Ground Truth Labels.

Casey M Baker, Yiyang Gong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eNeuro, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Casey M BakerDepartments of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27701 casey.baker@duke.edu.
Yiyang GongDepartments of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27701.

Funding

Voltage Imaging Dissection of the Mammalian CortexDP2NS111505 · NINDS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI GONG, YIYANG · 2018 to 2018
$2.4M
Large-scale cellular-resolution voltage imaging of the zebrafish brainUF1NS107678 · NINDS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI GONG, YIYANG · 2018 to 2018
$1.2M
NINDS NIH HHS DP2 NS111505NINDS NIH HHS UF1 NS107678
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent advancements in two-photon calcium imaging have enabled scientists to record the activity of thousands of neurons with cellular resolution. This scope of data collection is crucial to understanding the next generation of neuroscience questions, but analyzing these large recordings requires automated methods for neuron segmentation. Supervised methods for neuron segmentation achieve state of-the-art accuracy and speed but currently require large amounts of manually generated ground truth training labels. We reduced the required number of training labels by designing a semi-supervised pipeline. Our pipeline used neural network ensembling to generate pseudolabels to train a single shallow U-Net. We tested our method on three publicly available datasets and compared our performance to three widely used segmentation methods. Our method outperformed other methods when trained on a small number of ground truth labels and could achieve state-of-the-art accuracy after training on approximately a quarter of the number of ground truth labels as supervised methods. When trained on many ground truth labels, our pipeline attained higher accuracy than that of state-of-the-art methods. Overall, our work will help researchers accurately process large neural recordings while minimizing the time and effort needed to generate manual labels.

Indexed as

NeuronsNeurosciencesCalciumImage Processing, Computer-AssistedNeural Networks, ComputerPhotonsCalciumcalcium imagingdeep learningneuron segmentationsemi-supervised

Identifiers

PMID38242690
PMCPMC10880440

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.