Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38241596›Full record

ArticleeLife2024

Implications of variable synaptic weights for rate and temporal coding of cerebellar outputs.

Shuting Wu, Asem Wardak, Mehak M Khan, Christopher H Chen, Wade G Regehr

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Characterization of direct Purkinje cell outputs to the brainstem.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Shuting Wu *Department of Neurobiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2264-7393
Asem Wardak *Department of Neurobiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0048-1484
Mehak M KhanDepartment of Neurobiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5710-7421
Christopher H ChenDepartment of Neurobiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States.
Wade G RegehrDepartment of Neurobiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3485-8094
Harvard University · USPennsylvania State University · US

Funding

Mechanisms and Functions of Synapses and CircuitsR35NS097284 · NINDS · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI REGEHR, WADE G · 2017 to 2024
$7.5M
Short-Term Synaptic Plasticity in the CNSR01NS032405 · NINDS · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (MEDICAL SCHOOL) · PI REGEHR, WADE G · 1995 to 2016
$4.8M
Cerebellar Outputs Through an Unconventional NucleusR00NS110978 · NINDS · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI CHEN, CHRISTOPHER · 2023 to 2025
$711k
Cerebellar Outputs Through an Unconventional NucleusK99NS110978 · NINDS · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI CHEN, CHRISTOPHER · 2020 to 2021
$190k
NIH HHS K99NS110978NIH HHS R01NS032405NIH HHS R35NS097284NINDS NIH HHS K99 NS110978NINDS NIH HHS R00 NS110978NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS032405NINDS NIH HHS R35 NS097284
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purkinje cell (PC) synapses onto cerebellar nuclei (CbN) neurons allow signals from the cerebellar cortex to influence the rest of the brain. PCs are inhibitory neurons that spontaneously fire at high rates, and many PC inputs are thought to converge onto each CbN neuron to suppress its firing. It has been proposed that PCs convey information using a rate code, a synchrony and timing code, or both. The influence of PCs on CbN neuron firing was primarily examined for the combined effects of many PC inputs with comparable strengths, and the influence of individual PC inputs has not been extensively studied. Here, we find that single PC to CbN synapses are highly variable in size, and using dynamic clamp and modeling we reveal that this has important implications for PC-CbN transmission. Individual PC inputs regulate both the rate and timing of CbN firing. Large PC inputs strongly influence CbN firing rates and transiently eliminate CbN firing for several milliseconds. Remarkably, the refractory period of PCs leads to a brief elevation of CbN firing prior to suppression. Thus, individual PC-CbN synapses are suited to concurrently convey rate codes and generate precisely timed responses in CbN neurons. Either synchronous firing or synchronous pauses of PCs promote CbN neuron firing on rapid time scales for nonuniform inputs, but less effectively than for uniform inputs. This is a secondary consequence of variable input sizes elevating the baseline firing rates of CbN neurons by increasing the variability of the inhibitory conductance. These findings may generalize to other brain regions with highly variable inhibitory synapse sizes.

Indexed as

CerebellumPurkinje CellsAction PotentialsCerebellar CortexCerebellar NucleiNeuronscerebellumdeep cerebellar nucleidisinhibitionmouseneurosciencePurkinje cellrate codetime code

Identifiers

PMID38241596
PMCPMC10798666
OpenAlexW4391045338

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.