Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38241406›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Implementation of antimicrobial stewardship programs: A study of prescribers' perspective of facilitators and barriers.

Emelda E Chukwu, Dennis Abuh, Ifeoma E Idigbe, Kazeem A Osuolale, Vivian Chuka-Ebene, Oluwatoyin Awoderu, Rosemary A Audu, Folasade T Ogunsola

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Emelda E ChukwuAntimicrobial Resistance Research group, Nigerian Institute of Medical Research, Yaba, Lagos State, Nigeria.ORCID 0000-0002-3110-1678
Dennis AbuhAntimicrobial Resistance Research group, Nigerian Institute of Medical Research, Yaba, Lagos State, Nigeria.
Ifeoma E IdigbeAntimicrobial Resistance Research group, Nigerian Institute of Medical Research, Yaba, Lagos State, Nigeria.
Kazeem A OsuolaleAntimicrobial Resistance Research group, Nigerian Institute of Medical Research, Yaba, Lagos State, Nigeria.
Vivian Chuka-EbeneAntimicrobial Resistance Research group, Nigerian Institute of Medical Research, Yaba, Lagos State, Nigeria.
Oluwatoyin AwoderuAntimicrobial Resistance Research group, Nigerian Institute of Medical Research, Yaba, Lagos State, Nigeria.
Rosemary A AuduAntimicrobial Resistance Research group, Nigerian Institute of Medical Research, Yaba, Lagos State, Nigeria.
Folasade T OgunsolaAntimicrobial Resistance Research group, Nigerian Institute of Medical Research, Yaba, Lagos State, Nigeria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite promising signs of the benefits associated with Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs (ASPs), there remains limited knowledge on how to implement ASPs in peculiar settings for a more elaborate impact. This study explored prescriber experiences and perceptions of the usefulness, and feasibility of strategies employed for the implementation of antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) interventions as well as challenges encountered.

methodsThis is a cross-sectional mixed-method survey of prescribers' perspective of the facilitators and barriers of implementing ASP. The quantitative approach comprised of a semi-structured questionnaire and data collected were analyzed using SPSS version 26 while the qualitative approach used focus group discussions followed by content analysis.

resultsOut of the thirty people that participated in the workshop, twenty-five completed the questionnaires which were analyzed. The respondents included 15 (60.0%) medical doctors and 10 (40.0%) pharmacists. The mean age of the respondents was 36.39±7.23 years with mean year of practice of 9.48±6.01 years. Majority of them (84.0%) were in a position to provide input on the implementation of AMS in their facilities, although their managements had the final decision. The pharmacists (100%) were more likely to agree that antibiotic resistance was a problem for their practice than the medical doctors (78.6%) while equal number (80.0%) of respondents (pharmacists and medical doctors) believed that inappropriate prescribing was a problem. Having a specialized and dedicated team with effective monitoring was recognized as crucial for effective ASP while inadequate personnel was identified as a major barrier. We identified stakeholder's engagement, policies and regulation, as well as education as themes for improving AMS in the country.

conclusionThe results gave insight into the prescribers' perspective on the facilitators and barriers to antimicrobial stewardship; challenges and possible solutions to implementing ASPs in health facilities in Lagos State. We further identified pertinent contextual factors that need to be addressed when developing ASPs in healthcare facilities in a resource-poor setting.

Indexed as

Antimicrobial StewardshipPhysiciansAdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsCross-Sectional StudiesHumansNigeriaPharmacistsAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID38241406
PMCPMC10798493

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.