Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38241389›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Field assessment of the operating procedures of a semi-quantitative G6PD Biosensor to improve repeatability of routine testing.

Arkasha Sadhewa, Alina Chaudhary, Lydia V Panggalo, Angela Rumaseb, Nabaraj Adhikari, Sanjib Adhikari, Komal Raj Rijal, Megha Raj Banjara, Ric N Price, Kamala Thriemer and 3 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Arkasha SadhewaGlobal and Tropical Health Division, Menzies School of Health Research and Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7397-4568
Alina ChaudharyCentral Department of Microbiology, Tribhuvan University, Kirtipur, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Lydia V PanggaloEXEINS Health Initiative, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Angela RumasebGlobal and Tropical Health Division, Menzies School of Health Research and Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Australia.
Nabaraj AdhikariCentral Department of Microbiology, Tribhuvan University, Kirtipur, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Sanjib AdhikariCentral Department of Microbiology, Tribhuvan University, Kirtipur, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Komal Raj RijalCentral Department of Microbiology, Tribhuvan University, Kirtipur, Kathmandu, Nepal.ORCID 0000-0001-6281-8236
Megha Raj BanjaraCentral Department of Microbiology, Tribhuvan University, Kirtipur, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Ric N PriceGlobal and Tropical Health Division, Menzies School of Health Research and Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2000-2874
Kamala ThriemerGlobal and Tropical Health Division, Menzies School of Health Research and Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Australia.
Prakash GhimireCentral Department of Microbiology, Tribhuvan University, Kirtipur, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Benedikt LeyGlobal and Tropical Health Division, Menzies School of Health Research and Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5734-0845
Ari Winasti SatyagrahaEXEINS Health Initiative, Jakarta, Indonesia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In remote communities, diagnosis of G6PD deficiency is challenging. We assessed the impact of modified test procedures and delayed testing for the point-of-care diagnostic STANDARD G6PD (SDBiosensor, RoK), and evaluated recommended cut-offs. We tested capillary blood from fingerpricks (Standard Method) and a microtainer (BD, USA; Method 1), venous blood from a vacutainer (BD, USA; Method 2), varied sample application methods (Methods 3), and used micropipettes rather than the test's single-use pipette (Method 4). Repeatability was assessed by comparing median differences between paired measurements. All methods were tested 20 times under laboratory conditions on three volunteers. The Standard Method and the method with best repeatability were tested in Indonesia and Nepal. In Indonesia 60 participants were tested in duplicate by both methods, in Nepal 120 participants were tested in duplicate by either method. The adjusted male median (AMM) of the Biosensor Standard Method readings was defined as 100% activity. In Indonesia, the difference between paired readings of the Standard and modified methods was compared to assess the impact of delayed testing. In the pilot study repeatability didn't differ significantly (p = 0.381); Method 3 showed lowest variability. One Nepalese participant had <30% activity, one Indonesian and 10 Nepalese participants had intermediate activity (≥30% to <70% activity). Repeatability didn't differ significantly in Indonesia (Standard: 0.2U/gHb [IQR: 0.1-0.4]; Method 3: 0.3U/gHb [IQR: 0.1-0.5]; p = 0.425) or Nepal (Standard: 0.4U/gHb [IQR: 0.2-0.6]; Method 3: 0.3U/gHb [IQR: 0.1-0.6]; p = 0.330). Median G6PD measurements by Method 3 were 0.4U/gHb (IQR: -0.2 to 0.7, p = 0.005) higher after a 5-hour delay compared to the Standard Method. The definition of 100% activity by the Standard Method matched the manufacturer-recommended cut-off for 70% activity. We couldn't improve repeatability. Delays of up to 5 hours didn't result in a clinically relevant difference in measured G6PD activity. The manufacturer's recommended cut-off for intermediate deficiency is conservative.

Indexed as

Biosensing TechniquesGlucosephosphate Dehydrogenase DeficiencySodium OxybateGlucosephosphate DehydrogenaseHumansMalePilot ProjectsGlucosephosphate DehydrogenaseSodium Oxybate

Identifiers

PMID38241389
PMCPMC10798449

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.