Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38241358›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Measures of empathy and compassion: A scoping review.

Cassandra Vieten, Caryn Kseniya Rubanovich, Lora Khatib, Meredith Sprengel, Chloé Tanega, Craig Polizzi, Pantea Vahidi, Anne Malaktaris, Gage Chu, Ariel J Lang and 3 more

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. (State) empathy: how context matters.Frontiers in psychology · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Cassandra VietenCenters for Integrative Health, Department of Family Medicine, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-3081-5174
Caryn Kseniya RubanovichDepartment of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, California, United States of America.
Lora KhatibDepartment of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, California, United States of America.
Meredith SprengelHuman Factors, Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research (TNO), Soesterberg, The Netherlands.
Chloé TanegaClarke Center for Human Imagination, School of Physical Sciences, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-1596-3737
Craig PolizziU.S. Department of Veteran Affairs, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Pantea VahidiCompassion Clinic, San Diego, California, United States of America.
Anne MalaktarisDepartment of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, California, United States of America.
Gage ChuVA San Diego Center of Excellence for Stress and Mental Health, San Diego, California, United States of America.
Ariel J LangDepartment of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, California, United States of America.
Ming Tai-SealeDepartments of Family Medicine and Medicine (Bioinformatics), School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-9272-066X
Lisa EylerDepartment of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, California, United States of America.
Cinnamon BlossDepartment of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, California, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evidence to date indicates that compassion and empathy are health-enhancing qualities. Research points to interventions and practices involving compassion and empathy being beneficial, as well as being salient outcomes of contemplative practices such as mindfulness. Advancing the science of compassion and empathy requires that we select measures best suited to evaluating effectiveness of training and answering research questions. The objective of this scoping review was to 1) determine what instruments are currently available for measuring empathy and compassion, 2) assess how and to what extent they have been validated, and 3) provide an online tool to assist researchers and program evaluators in selecting appropriate measures for their settings and populations. A scoping review and broad evidence map were employed to systematically search and present an overview of the large and diverse body of literature pertaining to measuring compassion and empathy. A search string yielded 19,446 articles, and screening resulted in 559 measure development or validation articles reporting on 503 measures focusing on or containing subscales designed to measure empathy and/or compassion. For each measure, we identified the type of measure, construct being measured, in what context or population it was validated, response set, sample items, and how many different types of psychometrics had been assessed for that measure. We provide tables summarizing these data, as well as an open-source online interactive data visualization allowing viewers to search for measures of empathy and compassion, review their basic qualities, and access original citations containing more detail. Finally, we provide a rubric to help readers determine which measure(s) might best fit their context.

Indexed as

EmpathyMindfulnessPsychometrics

Identifiers

PMID38241358
PMCPMC10798632

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.