Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38241294›Full record

Trial reportAnesthesiology2024

Reversal of Propofol-induced Depression of the Hypoxic Ventilatory Response by BK-channel Blocker ENA-001: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Simone C Jansen, Maarten van Lemmen, Erik Olofsen, Laurence Moss, Joseph V Pergolizzi, Thomas Miller, Robert D Colucci, Monique van Velzen, Philip Kremer, Albert Dahan and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Anesthesiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Targeting the Carotid Body Function With Big-KPharmacology research & perspectives · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Simone C JansenDepartment of Anesthesiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Maarten van LemmenDepartment of Anesthesiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Erik OlofsenDepartment of Anesthesiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Laurence MossCentre for Human Drug Research, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Joseph V PergolizziEnalare Therapeutics Inc., Princeton, New Jersey; NEMA Research Inc., Naples, Florida.
Thomas MillerEnalare Therapeutics Inc., Princeton, New Jersey; Department of Pediatrics, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Robert D ColucciNEMA Research Inc., Naples, Florida; Colucci & Associates, LLC, Newtown, Connecticut.
Monique van VelzenDepartment of Anesthesiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Philip KremerCentre for Human Drug Research, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Albert DahanDepartment of Anesthesiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; PainLess Foundation, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3161-3945
Rutger van der SchrierDepartment of Anesthesiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Marieke NiestersDepartment of Anesthesiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; PainLess Foundation, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Leiden University Medical Center · NLCentre for Human Drug Research · NLNema Research (United States) · USThomas Jefferson University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe use of anesthetics may result in depression of the hypoxic ventilatory response. Since there are no receptor-specific antagonists for most anesthetics, there is the need for agnostic respiratory stimulants that increase respiratory drive irrespective of its cause. The authors tested whether ENA-001, an agnostic respiratory stimulant that blocks carotid body BK-channels, could restore the hypoxic ventilatory response during propofol infusion. They hypothesize that ENA-001 is able to fully restore the hypoxic ventilatory response.

methodsIn this randomized, double-blind crossover trial, 14 male and female healthy volunteers were randomized to receive placebo and low- and high-dose ENA-001 on three separate occasions. On each occasion, isohypercapnic hypoxic ventilatory responses were measured during a fixed sequence of placebo, followed by low- and high-dose propofol infusion. The authors conducted a population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analysis that included oxygen and carbon dioxide kinetics.

resultsTwelve subjects completed the three sessions; no serious adverse events occurred. The propofol concentrations were 0.6 and 2.0 µg/ml at low and high dose, respectively. The ENA-001 concentrations were 0.6 and 1.0 µg/ml at low and high dose, respectively. The propofol concentration that reduced the hypoxic ventilatory response by 50% was 1.47 ± 0.20 µg/ml. The steady state ENA-001 concentration to increase the depressed ventilatory response by 50% was 0.51 ± 0.04 µg/ml. A concentration of 1 µg/ml ENA-001 was required for full reversal of the propofol effect at the propofol concentration that reduced the hypoxic ventilatory response by 50%.

conclusionsIn this pilot study, the authors demonstrated that ENA-001 restored the hypoxic ventilatory response impaired by propofol. This finding is not only of clinical importance but also provides mechanistic insights into the peripheral stimulation of breathing with ENA-001 overcoming central depression by propofol. EDITOR’S PERSPECTIVE:

Indexed as

Anesthetics, IntravenousCross-Over StudiesHypoxiaPropofolAdultDose-Response Relationship, DrugDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleYoung AdultAnesthetics, IntravenousPropofol

Identifiers

PMID38241294
PMCPMC11097949
OpenAlexW4391019780

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.