Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38240952›Full record

ArticleClinical and experimental medicine2024

Evaluation of NTRK expression and fusions in a large cohort of early-stage lung cancer.

Anne Pernille Harlem Dyrbekk, Abdirashid Ali Warsame, Pål Suhrke, Marianne Odnakk Ludahl, Nermin Zecic, Joakim Oliu Moe, Marius Lund-Iversen, Odd Terje Brustugun

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and experimental medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Anne Pernille Harlem DyrbekkUniversity of Oslo, NO-0316, Oslo, Norway. anndyr@siv.no.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-7930-9153
Abdirashid Ali WarsameDepartment of Pathology, Oslo University Hospital, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, NO-0310, Oslo, Norway.
Pål SuhrkeDepartment of Pathology, Vestfold Hospital Trust, NO-3103, Tønsberg, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3133-5503
Marianne Odnakk LudahlDepartment of Microbiology/Division for Gene-Technology, Vestfold Hospital Trust, NO-3103, Tønsberg, Norway.
Nermin ZecicDepartment of Microbiology/Division for Gene-Technology, Vestfold Hospital Trust, NO-3103, Tønsberg, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-0687-424X
Joakim Oliu MoeDepartment of Internal Medicine, Vestfold Hospital Trust, NO-3103, Tønsberg, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-9680-6329
Marius Lund-IversenDepartment of Pathology, Oslo University Hospital, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, NO-0310, Oslo, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2025-4062
Odd Terje BrustugunUniversity of Oslo, NO-0316, Oslo, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5153-8391
Sykehuset i Vestfold · NOOslo University Hospital · NOOsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University · NOUniversity of Oslo · NO

Funding

South-Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority 2018049The Research fund Vestfold Hospital Trust 198223The South-Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority 2022020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tropomyosin receptor kinases (TRK) are attractive targets for cancer therapy. As TRK-inhibitors are approved for all solid cancers with detectable fusions involving the Neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase (NTRK)-genes, there has been an increased interest in optimizing testing regimes. In this project, we wanted to find the prevalence of NTRK fusions in a cohort of various histopathological types of early-stage lung cancer in Norway and to investigate the association between TRK protein expression and specific histopathological types, including their molecular and epidemiological characteristics. We used immunohistochemistry (IHC) as a screening tool for TRK expression, and next-generation sequencing (NGS) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) as confirmatory tests for underlying NTRK-fusion. Among 940 cases, 43 (4.6%) had positive TRK IHC, but in none of these could a NTRK fusion be confirmed by NGS or FISH. IHC-positive cases showed various staining intensities and patterns including cytoplasmatic or nuclear staining. IHC-positivity was more common in squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC) (10.3%) and adenoid cystic carcinoma (40.0%), where the majority showed heterogeneous staining intensity. In comparison, only 1.1% of the adenocarcinomas were positive. IHC-positivity was also more common in men, but this association could be explained by the dominance of LUSC in TRK IHC-positive cases. Protein expression was not associated with differences in time to relapse or overall survival. Our study indicates that NTRK fusion is rare in early-stage lung cancer. Due to the high level of false positive cases with IHC, Pan-TRK IHC is less suited as a screening tool for NTRK-fusions in LUSC and adenoid cystic carcinoma.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Adenoid CysticLung NeoplasmsNeoplasmsHumansIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceMaleNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalOncogene Proteins, FusionReceptor, trkAReceptor, trkBReceptor, trkCOncogene Proteins, FusionReceptor, trkAReceptor, trkBReceptor, trkCFluorescence in situ hybridizationImmunohistochemistryLung cancerMolecular pathologyNext-generation sequencingNTRK

Identifiers

PMID38240952
PMCPMC10798916
OpenAlexW4391035385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.