Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38240840›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2024

Forensic age estimation of the knee by post-mortem DR, CT, and MR imaging: a comparative study.

Apameh Khatam-Lashgari, Mette Lønstrup Harving, Chiara Villa, Niels Lynnerup, Sara Tangmose Larsen

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
20.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Apameh Khatam-LashgariDepartment of Forensic Medicine, Section of Forensic Pathology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. apameh.khatam-lashgari@sund.ku.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2427-5741
Mette Lønstrup HarvingDepartment of Radiology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0525-9057
Chiara VillaDepartment of Forensic Medicine, Section of Forensic Pathology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9967-8131
Niels LynnerupDepartment of Forensic Medicine, Section of Forensic Pathology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7771-5376
Sara Tangmose LarsenDepartment of Forensic Medicine, Section of Forensic Pathology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2210-7576
University of Copenhagen · DKRigshospitalet · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is believed by many that reference data for age estimation purposes must be imaging-modality specific. A study from our department has however proven otherwise. We therefore found it interesting to investigate this further by looking at the level of agreement between different imaging modalities. The aim of this study was to investigate the level of agreement between the three radiological modalities, computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and digital radiography (DR), in assessing the ossification of the epiphyses of the knee. A total of 34 deceased individuals of 10-25 years of age, brought in for a medicolegal autopsy at our department, were scanned by CT, MRI, and DR. The ossification stages of the three bones of the right knee, distal femoral, proximal tibial, and proximal fibular epiphysis were assessed using the established combined staging method by Schmeling et al. and Kellinghaus et al. Analysis of the results by Cohen's weighted kappa showed a good agreement between CT and DR (K = 0.61-0.70), and MRI and DR (K = 0.68-0.79) but only moderate agreement between CT and MRI (K = 0.55-0.57). This leads us to conclude that different radiological images cannot be used interchangeably for age estimation purposes, so reference material needs to be imaging-modality specific. However, to make a more general conclusion research on a larger population is needed.

Indexed as

Age Determination by SkeletonForensic AnthropologyEpiphysesHumansKnee JointMagnetic Resonance ImagingOsteogenesisTomography, X-Ray ComputedForensic age estimationImaging methodsOssificationPost-mortem

Identifiers

PMID38240840
PMCPMC11004047
OpenAlexW4391025293

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.