Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38240784›Full record

Trial reportThe Lancet. Child & adolescent health2023

Higher versus lower nasal continuous positive airway pressure for extubation of extremely preterm infants in Australia (ÉCLAT): a multicentre, randomised, superiority trial.

Anna M Kidman, Brett J Manley, Rosemarie A Boland, Atul Malhotra, Susan M Donath, Friederike Beker, Peter G Davis, Risha Bhatia

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter StudyEquivalence Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Lancet. Child & adolescent health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07522346 (deMISTify), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07522346 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

deMISTify: The Impact of CPAP Levels During Minimally Invasive Surfactant Therapy on Regional Patterns of Ventilation in Preterm Infants

TypeinterventionalSponsorMurdoch Childrens Research InstituteRan2026 to 2028Enrolled36ConditionsSurfactant Deficiency Syndrome NeonatalArmsLung Recruitment Manoeuvre prior to Minimally Invasive Surfactant Therapy, Control (Minimally Invasive Surfactant Therapy)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Peri-extubation settings in preterm neonates: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2024
    Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Interprofessional perspectives on non-invasive respiratory support practices in extremely preterm infants: a Canadian survey.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anna M KidmanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Monash Newborn, Monash Children's Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Newborn Research, The Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Brett J ManleyDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Newborn Research, The Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Clinical Sciences, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Rosemarie A BolandDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Clinical Sciences, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Atul MalhotraMonash Newborn, Monash Children's Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Department of Paediatrics, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; The Ritchie Centre, Hudson Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Susan M DonathClinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics Unit, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Friederike BekerNeonatal Critical Care Unit, Mater Mothers' Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Peter G DavisDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Newborn Research, The Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Clinical Sciences, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Risha BhatiaMonash Newborn, Monash Children's Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Department of Paediatrics, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. Electronic address: risha.bhatia@monashhealth.org.
Murdoch Children's Research Institute · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExtremely preterm infants often require invasive mechanical ventilation, and clinicians aim to extubate these infants as soon as possible. However, extubation failure occurs in up to 60% of extremely preterm infants and is associated with increased mortality and morbidity. Nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) is the most common post-extubation respiratory support, but there is no consensus on the optimal nCPAP level to safely avoid extubation failure in extremely preterm infants. We aimed to determine if higher nCPAP levels compared with standard nCPAP levels would decrease rates of extubation failure in extremely preterm infants within 7 days of their first extubation.

methodsIn this multicentre, randomised, open-label controlled trial done at three tertiary perinatal centres in Australia, we assigned extremely preterm infants to extubation to either higher nCPAP (10 cmH

findingsBetween March 3, 2019, and July 31, 2022, 483 infants were born at less than 28 weeks and admitted to the recruiting centres. 92 infants were not eligible, 172 were not approached, 65 families declined to participate, and 15 consented but were not randomly assigned. 139 infants were enrolled and randomly assigned, 70 to the higher nCPAP group and 69 to the standard nCPAP group. One infant in the higher nCPAP group was excluded from the analysis because consent was withdrawn after randomisation. 104 (75%) of 138 mothers were White. The mean gestation was 25·7 weeks (SD 1·3) and the mean birthweight was 777 grams (201). 70 (51%) of 138 infants were female. Extubation failure occurred in 24 (35%) of 69 infants in the higher nCPAP group and in 39 (57%) of 69 infants in the standard nCPAP group (risk difference -21·7%, 95% CI -38·5% to -3·7%). There were no significant differences in rates of adverse events between groups during the primary outcome period. Three patients died (two in the higher nCPAP group and one in the standard nCPAP group), pneumothorax occurred in one patient from each group, spontaneous intestinal perforation in three patients (two in the higher nCPAP group and one in the standard nCPAP group) and there were no events of pulmonary interstitial emphysema.

interpretationExtubation of extremely preterm infants to higher nCPAP significantly reduced extubation failure compared with extubation to standard nCPAP, without increasing rates of adverse effects. Future larger trials are essential to confirm these findings in terms of both efficacy and safety.

fundingNational Health and Medical Research Council Centre for Research Excellence in Newborn Medicine, number 1153176.

Indexed as

Continuous Positive Airway PressureInfant, Extremely PrematureAirway ExtubationAustraliaFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornMaleProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID38240784
OpenAlexW4388191443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.