Trial reportThe Lancet. Child & adolescent health2023
Higher versus lower nasal continuous positive airway pressure for extubation of extremely preterm infants in Australia (ÉCLAT): a multicentre, randomised, superiority trial.
Trial report in The Lancet. Child & adolescent health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07522346 (deMISTify), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
deMISTify: The Impact of CPAP Levels During Minimally Invasive Surfactant Therapy on Regional Patterns of Ventilation in Preterm Infants
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Continuous positive airway pressure versus methylxanthine for apnoea in preterm infants.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Postextubation use of non-invasive respiratory support in preterm infants: a network meta-analysis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Non-invasive respiratory support in preterm infants as primary mode: a network meta-analysis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Nasal continuous positive airway pressure immediately after extubation for preventing morbidity in preterm infants.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024Pooled it
- Peri-extubation settings in preterm neonates: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2024Pooled it
- Higher PEEP reduces duration of mechanical ventilation in neonatal respiratory distress syndrome of late preterm and term newborn infants.Scientific reports · 2025Trial
- Non-invasive open lung strategy in delivery room: randomized controlled trial (OpenCPAP-DR).European journal of pediatrics · 2025Trial
- Structured implementation of a bubble-CPAP program to reduce bronchopulmonary dysplasia in preterm infants.Pediatric research · 2026Article
- Nomogram-based prediction model for extubation failure in preterm infants with invasive mechanical ventilation.Italian journal of pediatrics · 2025Article
- Noninvasive Ventilation Strategies in Neonates.Indian pediatrics · 2025Review
- Interprofessional perspectives on non-invasive respiratory support practices in extremely preterm infants: a Canadian survey.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2025Article
- Post-extubation using high nCPAP: are we ready for the change?Translational pediatrics · 2024Article
- Article
- Non-Invasive Ventilatory Support in Preterm Neonates in the Delivery Room and the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: A Short Narrative Review of What We Know in 2024.Neonatology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundExtremely preterm infants often require invasive mechanical ventilation, and clinicians aim to extubate these infants as soon as possible. However, extubation failure occurs in up to 60% of extremely preterm infants and is associated with increased mortality and morbidity. Nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) is the most common post-extubation respiratory support, but there is no consensus on the optimal nCPAP level to safely avoid extubation failure in extremely preterm infants. We aimed to determine if higher nCPAP levels compared with standard nCPAP levels would decrease rates of extubation failure in extremely preterm infants within 7 days of their first extubation.
methodsIn this multicentre, randomised, open-label controlled trial done at three tertiary perinatal centres in Australia, we assigned extremely preterm infants to extubation to either higher nCPAP (10 cmH
findingsBetween March 3, 2019, and July 31, 2022, 483 infants were born at less than 28 weeks and admitted to the recruiting centres. 92 infants were not eligible, 172 were not approached, 65 families declined to participate, and 15 consented but were not randomly assigned. 139 infants were enrolled and randomly assigned, 70 to the higher nCPAP group and 69 to the standard nCPAP group. One infant in the higher nCPAP group was excluded from the analysis because consent was withdrawn after randomisation. 104 (75%) of 138 mothers were White. The mean gestation was 25·7 weeks (SD 1·3) and the mean birthweight was 777 grams (201). 70 (51%) of 138 infants were female. Extubation failure occurred in 24 (35%) of 69 infants in the higher nCPAP group and in 39 (57%) of 69 infants in the standard nCPAP group (risk difference -21·7%, 95% CI -38·5% to -3·7%). There were no significant differences in rates of adverse events between groups during the primary outcome period. Three patients died (two in the higher nCPAP group and one in the standard nCPAP group), pneumothorax occurred in one patient from each group, spontaneous intestinal perforation in three patients (two in the higher nCPAP group and one in the standard nCPAP group) and there were no events of pulmonary interstitial emphysema.
interpretationExtubation of extremely preterm infants to higher nCPAP significantly reduced extubation failure compared with extubation to standard nCPAP, without increasing rates of adverse effects. Future larger trials are essential to confirm these findings in terms of both efficacy and safety.
fundingNational Health and Medical Research Council Centre for Research Excellence in Newborn Medicine, number 1153176.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.