Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38240774›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of nutrition2024

Malnutrition prevalence according to GLIM and its feasibility in geriatric patients: a prospective cross-sectional study.

Maria Enge, Frida Ostonen Peelen, Rikke Lundsgaard Nielsen, Anne Marie Beck, Ann Ödlund Olin, Tommy Cederholm, Anne-Marie Boström, Ingvild Paur

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of nutrition, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
8.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. [Malnutrition-A central geriatric syndrome].Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie · 2026
    Review
  3. Observational
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Maria Enge *Department of Geriatric Medicine, Jakobsbergsgeriatriken, Stockholm, Sweden.
Frida Ostonen Peelen *Theme Inflammation and Aging, Nursing Unit Aging, Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge, Sweden.
Rikke Lundsgaard NielsenDepartment of Clinical Research, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager and Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark.
Anne Marie BeckDietetic and Nutritional Research Unit EATEN, Herlev and Gentofte University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark.
Ann Ödlund OlinDepartment of Quality and Patient Safety, Karolinska University Hospital Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden.
Tommy CederholmTheme Inflammation and Aging, Medical Unit Aging, Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge, Sweden.
Anne-Marie BoströmTheme Inflammation and Aging, Nursing Unit Aging, Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge, Sweden.
Ingvild PaurNorwegian Advisory Unit On Disease-Related Undernutrition, Oslo, Norway. inpaur@ous-hf.no.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0215-6183
Karolinska University Hospital · SEGentofte Hospital · DKHvidovre Hospital · DKOslo University Hospital · NOUppsala University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIn 2019, the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) suggested a 2-step diagnostic format for malnutrition including screening and diagnosis. Prospective validation and feasibility studies, using the complete set of the five GLIM criteria, are needed. The aims of this study were to determine the prevalence of malnutrition, and investigate how the prevalence varied with mode of screening. Furthermore, we assessed the feasibility of GLIM in geriatric patients.

methodsConsecutive patients from two acute geriatric wards were included. For screening risk of malnutrition, the Mini Nutritional Assessment-Short Form (MNA-SF) or Malnutrition Screening Tool (MST) were used. In accordance with GLIM, a combination of phenotypic and etiologic criteria were required for the diagnosis of malnutrition. Feasibility was determined based on % data completeness, and above 80% completeness was considered feasible.

resultsOne hundred patients (mean age 82 years, 58% women) were included. After screening with MNA-SF malnutrition was confirmed by GLIM in 51%, as compared with 35% after screening with MST (p = 0.039). Corresponding prevalence was 58% with no prior screening. Using hand grip strength as a supportive measure for reduced muscle mass, 69% of the patients were malnourished. Feasibility varied between 70 and 100% for the different GLIM criteria, with calf circumference as a proxy for reduced muscle mass having the lowest feasibility.

conclusionIn acute geriatric patients, the prevalence of malnutrition according to GLIM varied depending on the screening tool used. In this setting, GLIM appears feasible, besides for the criterion of reduced muscle mass.

Indexed as

Hand StrengthMalnutritionAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansLeadershipMaleNutritional StatusNutrition AssessmentPrevalenceBody compositionFeasibilityGeriatric patientsGlobal leadership initiative on malnutritionHospitalMalnutrition

Identifiers

PMID38240774
PMCPMC10948466
OpenAlexW4391026901

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.