Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38240771›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2024

Is the spread of excitation different between adults and children cochlear implants users?

Maria Valéria Schmidt Goffi-Gomez, Francyelle Machado da Silva Corrêa, Ana Tereza Magalhães, Ana Cristina Hoshino, Paola Samuel, Tatiana Sadowski, Claudia Colalto, Robinson Koji Tsuji, Rubens Brito Neto

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. How differ eCAP types in cochlear implants users with and without inner ear malformations: amplitude growth function, spread of excitation, refractory recovery function.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Maria Valéria Schmidt Goffi-GomezENT Department, Cochlear Implant Group at Clinical Hospital of the Medical School at University of São Paulo, Av. Dr. Eneas de Carvalho Aguiar 255, São Paulo, Brazil. valeria.goffi@hc.fm.usp.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4440-7692
Francyelle Machado da Silva CorrêaENT Department, Cochlear Implant Group at Clinical Hospital of the Medical School at University of São Paulo, Av. Dr. Eneas de Carvalho Aguiar 255, São Paulo, Brazil.
Ana Tereza MagalhãesENT Department, Cochlear Implant Group at Clinical Hospital of the Medical School at University of São Paulo, Av. Dr. Eneas de Carvalho Aguiar 255, São Paulo, Brazil.
Ana Cristina HoshinoENT Department, Cochlear Implant Group at Clinical Hospital of the Medical School at University of São Paulo, Av. Dr. Eneas de Carvalho Aguiar 255, São Paulo, Brazil.
Paola SamuelENT Department, Cochlear Implant Group at Clinical Hospital of the Medical School at University of São Paulo, Av. Dr. Eneas de Carvalho Aguiar 255, São Paulo, Brazil.
Tatiana SadowskiENT Department, Cochlear Implant Group at Clinical Hospital of the Medical School at University of São Paulo, Av. Dr. Eneas de Carvalho Aguiar 255, São Paulo, Brazil.
Claudia ColaltoENT Department, Cochlear Implant Group at Clinical Hospital of the Medical School at University of São Paulo, Av. Dr. Eneas de Carvalho Aguiar 255, São Paulo, Brazil.
Robinson Koji TsujiENT Department, Cochlear Implant Group at Clinical Hospital of the Medical School at University of São Paulo, Av. Dr. Eneas de Carvalho Aguiar 255, São Paulo, Brazil.
Rubens Brito NetoENT Department, Cochlear Implant Group at Clinical Hospital of the Medical School at University of São Paulo, Av. Dr. Eneas de Carvalho Aguiar 255, São Paulo, Brazil.
Universidade de São Paulo · BRCochlear (Australia) · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWhile cochlea is adult size at birth, etiologies and bone density may differ between children and adults. Differences in neural response thresholds (tNRT) and the spread of excitation (SOE) width may impact the use of artificial intelligence algorithms in speech processor fitting.

aimTo identify whether neural response telemetry threshold and spread of excitation width are similar in adults and children.

methodsRetrospective cross-sectional study approved by the Ethical Board. Intraoperative tNRT and SOE recordings of consecutive cochlear implant surgeries in adults and children implanted with Cochlear devices (Cochlear™, Australia) were selected. SOE was recorded on electrode 11 (or adjacent, corresponding to the medial region of the cochlea) through the standard forward-masking technique in Custom Sound EP software, which provides SOE width in millimeters. Statistical comparison between adults and children was performed using the Mann-Whitney test (p ≤ 0.05).

resultsOf 1282 recordings of intraoperative evaluations, 414 measurements were selected from children and adults. Despite the tNRT being similar between adults and children, SOE width was significantly different, with lower values in children with perimodiolar arrays. Besides, it was observed that there is a difference in the electrode where the SOE function peak occurred, more frequently shifted to electrode 12 in adults implanted. In straight arrays, there was no difference in any of the parameters analyzed on electrode 11.

conclusionAlthough eCAP thresholds are similar, SOE measurements differ between adults and children in perimodiolar electrodes.

Indexed as

Cochlear ImplantsAdolescentAdultAgedAge FactorsAuditory ThresholdChildChild, PreschoolCochleaCochlear ImplantationCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansInfantMaleMiddle AgedArtificial intelligenceCochlear implantsNeural responseProgrammingSpread of excitationTelemetry

Identifiers

PMID38240771
OpenAlexW4391023733

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.