Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38240687›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical theory and computation2024

A Fast, Convenient, Polarizable Electrostatic Model for Molecular Dynamics.

Liangyue Wang, Michael Schauperl, David L Mobley, Christopher Bayly, Michael K Gilson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical theory and computation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Liangyue WangDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, San Diego, California 92093, United States.ORCID 0009-0008-5366-5942
Michael SchauperlHotSpot Therapeutics, Inc., Boston, Massachusetts 02210, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-5648-8170
David L MobleyDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of California, Irvine, California 92697, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-1083-5533
Christopher BaylyOpenEye Scientific, Cadence Molecular Sciences, Santa Fe, New Mexico 87508, United States.
Michael K GilsonSkaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of California, San Diego, California 92093, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-3375-1738

Funding

Univ.of Calif., Irvine Cancer Center Support GrantP30CA062203 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI Melanie Funes · 1994 to 2026
$57.9M
THEORY AND MODELING OF NONCOVALENT BINDINGR01GM061300 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MD BIOTECHNOLOGY INSTITUTE · PI GILSON, MICHAEL K. · 2000 to 2021
$7.2M
Open data-driven infrastructure for building biomolecular force fields for predictive biophysics and drug designR01GM132386 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO · PI SHIRTS, MICHAEL R · 2020 to 2023
$3.1M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA062203NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM061300NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM132386
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We present an efficient polarizable electrostatic model, utilizing typed, atom-centered polarizabilities and the fast direct approximation, designed for efficient use in molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. The model provides two convenient approaches for assigning partial charges in the context of atomic polarizabilities. One is a generalization of RESP, called RESP-dPol, and the other, AM1-BCC-dPol, is an adaptation of the widely used AM1-BCC method. Both are designed to accurately replicate gas-phase quantum mechanical electrostatic potentials. Benchmarks of this polarizable electrostatic model against gas-phase dipole moments, molecular polarizabilities, bulk liquid densities, and static dielectric constants of organic liquids show good agreement with the reference values. Of note, the model yields markedly more accurate dielectric constants of organic liquids, relative to a matched nonpolarizable force field. MD simulations with this method, which is currently parametrized for molecules containing elements C, N, O, and H, run only about 3.6-fold slower than fixed charge force fields, while simulations with the self-consistent mutual polarization average 4.5-fold slower. Our results suggest that RESP-dPol and AM1-BCC-dPol afford improved accuracy relative to fixed charge force fields and are good starting points for developing general, affordable, and transferable polarizable force fields. The software implementing these approaches has been designed to utilize the force field fitting frameworks developed and maintained by the Open Force Field Initiative, setting the stage for further exploration of this approach to polarizable force field development.

Identifiers

PMID38240687
PMCPMC10867846

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.