Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38240563›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2024

Exposure to a fungicide for a field-realistic duration does not alter bumble bee fecal microbiota structure.

Michelle Z Hotchkiss, Jessica R K Forrest, Alexandre J Poulain

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Michelle Z HotchkissDepartment of Biology, University of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4257-3467
Jessica R K ForrestDepartment of Biology, University of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Alexandre J PoulainDepartment of Biology, University of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0488-3993

Funding

Gouvernement du Canada | Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) Discovery GrantGouvernement du Canada | Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) PGS-DGovernment of Ontario (Ontario Government) OGS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social bees are frequently exposed to pesticides when foraging on nectar and pollen. Recent research has shown that pesticide exposure not only impacts social bee host health but can also alter the community structure of social bee gut microbiotas. However, most research on pesticide-bee gut microbiota interactions has been conducted in honey bees; bumble bees, native North American pollinators, have received less attention and, due to differences in their ecology, may be exposed to certain pesticides for shorter durations than honey bees. Here, we examine how exposure to the fungicide chlorothalonil for a short, field-realistic duration alters bumble bee fecal microbiotas (used as a proxy for gut microbiotas) and host performance. We expose small groups of

Indexed as

Fungicides, IndustrialMicrobiotaPesticidesAnimalsBeesNitrilesFungicides, IndustrialNitrilesPesticidestetrachloroisophthalonitrileBombusbumble bee microcoloniesbumble beesfecal microbiomesgut microbiomespesticide exposuresocial bee gut microbiota

Identifiers

PMID38240563
PMCPMC10880609

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.