Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38240459›Full record

ArticleJournal of midwifery & women's health

A Qualitative Study of Hospitals and Payers Implementing Community Doula Support.

Christina Gebel, Elysia Larson, Heather A Olden, Cara B Safon, Tonia J Rhone, Ndidiamaka N Amutah-Onukagha

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of midwifery & women's health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Christina GebelDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0002-9238-1343
Elysia LarsonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Heather A OldenHarvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
Cara B SafonDepartment of Health Law, Policy, and Management, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
Tonia J RhoneWright State University Boonshoft School of Medicine, Fairborn, Ohio.
Ndidiamaka N Amutah-OnukaghaDepartment of Public Health and Community Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.
Boston University · USBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · USHarvard University · USTufts University · USWright State University · US

Funding

Reducing Racial Disparities in SMM post COVID19: Assessing the integration of maternal safety bundles and community based doulas to improve outcomes for Black womenR01MD016026 · NIMHD · TUFTS UNIVERSITY BOSTON · PI AMUTAH-ONUKAGHA, NDIDIAMAKA, DECLERCQ, EUGENE R · 2020 to 2024
$3.1M
NIMHD NIH HHS R01 MD016026
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe impact of doula care on birth outcomes is well-established; however, doula support remains underutilized. Identifying barriers and facilitators to implementation is integral as the demand for doula care increases. The primary objective of this study was to examine doula program implementation across hospitals and payers at varying stages of implementation.

methodsRepresentatives from 4 hospitals and 2 payers participated in focus group discussions. The doula programs were categorized as anticipated, initial, and advanced implementation statuses. Coding and thematic analysis were conducted using a deductive application of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.

resultsThere were 20 participants across 5 focus group discussions. Participants were mostly female, and nearly all had worked at their organization for at least 2 years. Salient themes shared across participants included valuing internal outcome data or peer-reviewed literature to support doula care as well as anecdotal stories; the reality of the resource-intensive nature of doula care implementation that goes beyond funding for doulas; and both the need for individual champions for change, such as midwives, and a supportive organizational culture that values health equity. DISCUSSION: The findings of this study highlight 3 contextual aspects that should be considered when implementing doula programs. These recommendations include: (1) use of a combination of research evidence and anecdotes when eliciting stakeholder support; (2) consideration of resources beyond funding such as program implementation support; (3) critical evaluation of organizational culture as a primary driver influencing the implementation of doula care. The future of the doula workforce in United States hospitals rests on the crux of intentional buy-in from hospital administration and clinical providers as well as the availability of requisite resources.

Indexed as

DoulasFocus GroupsHospitalsQualitative ResearchAdultFemaleHumansMaleMidwiferyOrganizational CulturePregnancyBlack maternal healthconcordant careconsolidated framework for implementation researchdoulasfocus groupsimplementationmaternal healthqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID38240459
PMCPMC11258205
OpenAlexW4391027640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.