Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38240330›Full record

ArticleJournal of minimal access surgery2024

The use of lidocaine infusion in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

Bakhtawar Awan, Mohamed Elsaigh, Beshoy Effat Elkomos, Azka Sohail, Ahmad Asqalan, Safa Owhida Mousa Baqar, Noha Ahmed Elgendy, Omnia S Saleh, Justyna Malgorzata Szul, Anna San Juan and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of minimal access surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Bakhtawar AwanDepartment of General and Emergency Surgery, Northwick Park Hospital, London North West University Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
Mohamed ElsaighDepartment of General and Emergency Surgery, Northwick Park Hospital, London North West University Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
Beshoy Effat ElkomosDepartment of General and Emergency Surgery, Northwick Park Hospital, London North West University Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
Azka SohailDepartment of General and Emergency Surgery, Northwick Park Hospital, London North West University Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
Ahmad AsqalanDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich, UK.
Safa Owhida Mousa BaqarDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Derriford Hospital, University Hospital Plymouth, Plymouth, UK.
Noha Ahmed ElgendyDepartment of Acute and Emergency Medicine, Frimley Park Hospital, Frimley, UK.
Omnia S SalehDivision of General and GI Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Justyna Malgorzata SzulDepartment of General and Emergency Surgery, Northwick Park Hospital, London North West University Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
Anna San JuanDepartment of General and Emergency Surgery, Northwick Park Hospital, London North West University Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
Mohamed AlasmarLaboratory for Surgical and Metabolic Research, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Mohamed Mustafa MarzoukDepartment of General and Emergency Surgery, Northwick Park Hospital, London North West University Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
London North West Healthcare NHS Trust · GBNorthwick Park Hospital · GBBrigham and Women's Hospital · USDerriford Hospital · GBFrimley Park Hospital · GBHarvard University · USNorfolk and Norwich University Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

abstractBeing one of the most common abdominal surgical procedures, numerous techniques have been adapted to decrease post-operative pain post cholecystectomy. However, the efficacy of intravenous (IV) lidocaine in managing post operative pain after LC is still controversial, according to many recent studies. This study aims to detect the effectiveness of IV lidocaine compared to other medications in managing post-operative pain. PubMed, Scopes, Web of Science and Cochrane Library were searched for eligible studies from inception to June 2023, and a systematic review and meta-analysis was done. According to eligibility criteria, 14 studies (898 patients) were included in our study. The pooled results of the included studies showed that the pain score after 6, 12 and 24 h after the surgery was significantly lower in those who received IV lidocaine as a painkiller (Visual Analogue Scale [VAS] 6H, mean difference [MD] = -1.20, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -2.20, -0.20, P = 0.02; I2 = 98%, VAS 12H, MD = -0.90, 95% CI = -1.52, -0.29, P = 0.004; I2 = 96% and VAS 24H, MD = -0.86, 95% CI = -1.48, -0.24, P = 0.007; I2 = 92%). In addition, IV lidocaine is associated with a significant decrease in the opioid requirement after the surgery (opioid requirements, MD = -29.53, 95% CI = -55.41, -3.66, P = 0.03; I2 = 98%). However, there was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of nausea and vomiting after the surgery between the two groups (nausea and vomiting, relative risk = 0.91, 95% CI = 0.57, 1.45, P = 0.69; I2 = 50%). Lidocaine infusion in LC is associated with a significant decrease in post operative pain and in opioid requirements after the surgery.

Identifiers

PMID38240330
PMCPMC11354941
OpenAlexW4391034777

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.