ArticleJournal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI2024
Reproducibility and Repeatability of Intravoxel Incoherent Motion MRI Acquisition Methods in Liver.
Article in Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Validation of Intravoxel Incoherent Motion MRI Using Perfused Explanted Human Livers.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- Quantitative intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging histogram profiling identifies diffusion biomarkers for active thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy.BMC medical imaging · 2026Article
- Optimized acquisition for simultaneous intravoxel incoherent motion and RMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2025Article
- Optimized analytical segmented method for improved intravoxel incoherent motion parameter extraction in low-perfused tissues.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2025Article
- Effect of simultaneous multislice acceleration on the quantitative measurements of diffusion-weighted imaging, intravoxel incoherent motion, and diffusion kurtosis imaging in hepatocellular carcinoma and abdominal organs.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Report on the quantitative intra-voxel incoherent motion diffusion MRI reconstruction grand challenge.Medical physics · 2025Article
- Reproducibility of intravoxel incoherent motion quantification in the liver across field strengths and gradient hardware.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIntravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) diffusion weighted MRI (DWI) has potential for evaluating hepatic fibrosis but image acquisition technique influence on diffusion parameter estimation bears investigation. PURPOSE: To minimize variability and maximize repeatably in abdominal DWI in terms of IVIM parameter estimates. STUDY TYPE: Prospective test-retest and image quality comparison. SUBJECTS: Healthy volunteers (3F/7M, 29.9 ± 12.9 years) and Family Study subjects (18F/12M, 51.7 ± 16.7 years), without and with liver steatosis. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: Abdominal single-shot echo-planar imaging (EPI) and simultaneous multi-slice (SMS) DWI sequences with respiratory triggering (RT), breath-holding (BH), and navigator echo (NE) at 3 Tesla. ASSESSMENT: SMS-BH, EPI-NE, and SMS-RT data from twice-scanned healthy volunteers were analyzed using 6 × b-values (0-800 s⋅mm STATISTICAL TESTS: Coefficients of variation (CoV) and Bland Altman analyses were performed for test-retest repeatability. Interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) assessed interobserver agreement with P < 0.05 deemed significant.
resultsWithin-subject CoVs among volunteers (N = 10) for f and D DATA
conclusionSimultaneous multislice acquisitions had significantly less variability and higher ICCs of D EVIDENCE LEVEL: 2 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 1.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.