ArticleJournal of general and family medicine2024
Association between mentorship and mental health among junior residents: A nationwide cross-sectional study in Japan.
Article in Journal of general and family medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A scoping review of mentorship in Graduate Medical Education: a proposed conceptual framework.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Nationwide survey of formal mentorship characteristics and perceptions among resident physicians in Japan.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Five Strategies for Efficient and Effective Training of Japanese Resident Physicians Under the Japanese Work Style Reform.Advances in medical education and practice · 2025Article
- The relation between resident mentorship and in-training examination scores: A nation-wide, cross-sectional study in Japan.Journal of general and family medicine · 2024Article
- Association between mentorship and mental health among junior residents: A nationwide cross-sectional study in Japan.Journal of general and family medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Mentorship is a dynamic, reciprocal relationship in which an advanced careerist (mentor) encourages the growth of a novice (mentee). Mentorship may protect the mental health of residents at risk for depression and burnout, yet despite its frequent use and known benefits, limited reports exist regarding the prevalence and mental effects of mentorship on residents in Japan. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study involving postgraduate year 1 and 2 (PGY-1 and PGY-2) residents in Japan who took the General Medicine In-Training Examination (GM-ITE) at the end of the 2021 academic year. Data on mentorship were collected using surveys administered immediately following GM-ITE completion. The primary outcome was the Patient Health Questionaire-2 (PHQ-2), which consisted depressed mood and loss of interest. A positive response for either item indicated PHQ-2 positive. We examined associations between self-reported mentorship and PHQ-2 by multi-level analysis. Results: Of 4929 residents, 3266 (66.3%) residents reported having at least one mentor. Compared to residents without any mentor, those with a mentor were associated with a lower likelihood of a positive PHQ-2 response (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.75; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.65-0.86). Mentor characteristic significantly associated with negative PHQ-2 response was a formal mentor (aOR; 0.68; 95% CI 0.55-0.84). Conclusions: A mentor-based support system was positively associated with residents' mental health. Further research is needed to determine the quality of mentorship during clinical residency in Japan.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.