ArticleInternational journal of ophthalmology2024
Intelligent diagnosis of retinal vein occlusion based on color fundus photographs.
Article in International journal of ophthalmology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Interpretability of multimodal neural networks for prediction of visual acuity in patients with branch retinal vein occlusion.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Optimal Treatment of Retinal Vein Occlusion: An Updated Canadian Review and Recommendations.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Review
- Review
- Enhancing Ophthalmic Diagnosis and Treatment with Artificial Intelligence.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
- Global trends in retinal vein occlusion studies from 2004 to 2023: a bibliometric analysis.International journal of ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Enhancing ophthalmology students' awareness of retinitis pigmentosa: assessing the efficacy of ChatGPT in AI-assisted teaching of rare diseases-a quasi-experimental study.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Exploring potential imaging biomarkers for ischemic retinal vein occlusion: insights from fundus autofluorescence and optical coherence tomography.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Retinal Vein Occlusion-Background Knowledge and Foreground Knowledge Prospects-A Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Analysis and comparison of retinal vascular parameters under different glucose metabolic status based on deep learning.International journal of ophthalmology · 2024Article
- Multi-resolution visual Mamba with multi-directional selective mechanism for retinal disease detection.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo develop an artificial intelligence (AI) diagnosis model based on deep learning (DL) algorithm to diagnose different types of retinal vein occlusion (RVO) by recognizing color fundus photographs (CFPs).
methodsTotally 914 CFPs of healthy people and patients with RVO were collected as experimental data sets, and used to train, verify and test the diagnostic model of RVO. All the images were divided into four categories [normal, central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO), branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO), and macular retinal vein occlusion (MRVO)] by three fundus disease experts. Swin Transformer was used to build the RVO diagnosis model, and different types of RVO diagnosis experiments were conducted. The model's performance was compared to that of the experts.
resultsThe accuracy of the model in the diagnosis of normal, CRVO, BRVO, and MRVO reached 1.000, 0.978, 0.957, and 0.978; the specificity reached 1.000, 0.986, 0.982, and 0.976; the sensitivity reached 1.000, 0.955, 0.917, and 1.000; the F1-Sore reached 1.000, 0.955 0.943, and 0.887 respectively. In addition, the area under curve of normal, CRVO, BRVO, and MRVO diagnosed by the diagnostic model were 1.000, 0.900, 0.959 and 0.970, respectively. The diagnostic results were highly consistent with those of fundus disease experts, and the diagnostic performance was superior.
conclusionThe diagnostic model developed in this study can well diagnose different types of RVO, effectively relieve the work pressure of clinicians, and provide help for the follow-up clinical diagnosis and treatment of RVO patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.