ArticleContemporary oncology (Poznan, Poland)2023
FGFR2 point mutation in 2 cases of pleomorphic adenoma progressing to myoepithelial carcinoma.
Article in Contemporary oncology (Poznan, Poland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Potentially actionable molecular alterations in particular related to poor oncologic outcomes in salivary gland carcinomas.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- Molecular landscape of salivary gland malignancies. What is already known?Contemporary oncology (Poznan, Poland) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Salivary gland tumours are rare neoplasms. Pleomorphic adenoma (PA) is the most frequent benign lesion. Myoepithelial carcinoma (MECA) is rarely recognized malignancy, but the prognosis is unfavourable. The aim of this study was to identify genetic rearrangements that might be responsible for dynamic MECA progression in patients with primary radical PA excision. Material and methods: Next-generation sequencing (NGS) of 1500 gene coding sequences was performed in primary and recurrent tumour tissue collected from 2 patients, in whom PA was initially diagnosed and within one year multifocal MECA was detected. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded blocks with tumour tissues were subject to NGS analysis, involving small-scale mutations, as well as focal and chromosomal arm-level copy number changes. Results: This study showed mutations in the FGFR2 gene in PA and MECA tissues, obtained from both patients. One of them, pathogenic mutation p.Pro253Arg, was associated with sensitivity to registered drug inhibitors. Additionally, FGFR1, EGFR, and CDK4/CDK6 amplification, as well as CDKN2A/B deletion, were detected in one case. Furthermore, mutations in suppressor gene APC2 and PIK3C2A were detected, but only in MECA tissue. The analysis also identified the following chromosomal copy alterations: 4q12-q13.3, 9p21.3, 5q23.1-q34, del8p23.3-p12, and del13q21.31-q31.1. Conclusions: Rearrangement of the FGFR2 gene, identified in primary PA and MECA ex PA samples of both our patients, may be responsible for the malignant transformation and the disease progression. Further studies are encouraged to confirm the relevance of the findings. The therapy option with FGFR2 inhibitors may be considered in advanced or metastatic MECA ex PA with confirmed FGFR2 mutations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.