Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38239739›Full record

ArticlePlant phenomics (Washington, D.C.)2023

Global Wheat Head Detection Challenges: Winning Models and Application for Head Counting.

Etienne David, Franklin Ogidi, Daniel Smith, Scott Chapman, Benoit de Solan, Wei Guo, Frederic Baret, Ian Stavness

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Deep learning in plant phenotyping: the first ten years.Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.) · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Etienne DavidUMR 1114 EMMAH, INRAE, Avignon, France.
Franklin OgidiDepartment of Computer Science, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada.
Daniel SmithSchool of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Scott ChapmanSchool of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Benoit de SolanArvalis - Institut du Végétal, Paris, France.
Wei GuoGraduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Frederic BaretUMR 1114 EMMAH, INRAE, Avignon, France.
Ian StavnessDepartment of Computer Science, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Data competitions have become a popular approach to crowdsource new data analysis methods for general and specialized data science problems. Data competitions have a rich history in plant phenotyping, and new outdoor field datasets have the potential to embrace solutions across research and commercial applications. We developed the Global Wheat Challenge as a generalization competition in 2020 and 2021 to find more robust solutions for wheat head detection using field images from different regions. We analyze the winning challenge solutions in terms of their robustness when applied to new datasets. We found that the design of the competition had an influence on the selection of winning solutions and provide recommendations for future competitions to encourage the selection of more robust solutions.

Identifiers

PMID38239739
PMCPMC10795497

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.