ArticleChemical science2024
Designing solvent systems using self-evolving solubility databases and graph neural networks.
Article in Chemical science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Applications of Machine Learning in Micro-Nano Materials Research: From High-Throughput Screening to Intelligent Design.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026Review
- A fragment based approach towards curating, comparing and developing machine learning models applied in photochemistry.Chemical science · 2025Article
- Duality of Simplicity and Accuracy in QSPR: A Machine Learning Framework for Predicting Solubility of Selected Pharmaceutical Acids in Deep Eutectic Solvents.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Multi-model applications and cutting-edge advancements of artificial intelligence in hepatology in the era of precision medicine.World journal of gastroenterology · 2025Review
- Data-driven organic solubility prediction at the limit of aleatoric uncertainty.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Data Science-Driven Discovery of Optimal Conditions and a Condition-Selection Model for the Chan-Lam Coupling of Primary Sulfonamides.ACS catalysis · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Designing solvent systems is key to achieving the facile synthesis and separation of desired products from chemical processes, so many machine learning models have been developed to predict solubilities. However, breakthroughs are needed to address deficiencies in the model's predictive accuracy and generalizability; this can be addressed by expanding and integrating experimental and computational solubility databases. To maximize predictive accuracy, these two databases should not be trained separately, and they should not be simply combined without reconciling the discrepancies from different magnitudes of errors and uncertainties. Here, we introduce self-evolving solubility databases and graph neural networks developed through semi-supervised self-training approaches. Solubilities from quantum-mechanical calculations are referred to during semi-supervised learning, but they are not directly added to the experimental database. Dataset augmentation is performed from 11 637 experimental solubilities to >900 000 data points in the integrated database, while correcting for the discrepancies between experiment and computation. Our model was successfully applied to study solvent selection in organic reactions and separation processes. The accuracy (mean absolute error around 0.2 kcal mol
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.