Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38239675›Full record

ArticleChemical science2024

Designing solvent systems using self-evolving solubility databases and graph neural networks.

Yeonjoon Kim, Hojin Jung, Sabari Kumar, Robert S Paton, Seonah Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chemical science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yeonjoon KimDepartment of Chemistry, Colorado State University Fort Collins CO 80523 USA seonah.kim@colostate.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4784-7925
Hojin JungDepartment of Chemistry, Colorado State University Fort Collins CO 80523 USA seonah.kim@colostate.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-6756-4879
Sabari KumarDepartment of Chemistry, Colorado State University Fort Collins CO 80523 USA seonah.kim@colostate.edu.
Robert S PatonDepartment of Chemistry, Colorado State University Fort Collins CO 80523 USA seonah.kim@colostate.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0104-4166
Seonah KimDepartment of Chemistry, Colorado State University Fort Collins CO 80523 USA seonah.kim@colostate.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9846-7140

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Designing solvent systems is key to achieving the facile synthesis and separation of desired products from chemical processes, so many machine learning models have been developed to predict solubilities. However, breakthroughs are needed to address deficiencies in the model's predictive accuracy and generalizability; this can be addressed by expanding and integrating experimental and computational solubility databases. To maximize predictive accuracy, these two databases should not be trained separately, and they should not be simply combined without reconciling the discrepancies from different magnitudes of errors and uncertainties. Here, we introduce self-evolving solubility databases and graph neural networks developed through semi-supervised self-training approaches. Solubilities from quantum-mechanical calculations are referred to during semi-supervised learning, but they are not directly added to the experimental database. Dataset augmentation is performed from 11 637 experimental solubilities to >900 000 data points in the integrated database, while correcting for the discrepancies between experiment and computation. Our model was successfully applied to study solvent selection in organic reactions and separation processes. The accuracy (mean absolute error around 0.2 kcal mol

Identifiers

PMID38239675
PMCPMC10793204

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.