Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38239655›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2023

Motor dysfunction as a primary symptom predicts poor outcome: multicenter study of glioma symptoms.

Tomi Kivioja, Jussi P Posti, Jussi Sipilä, Minna Rauhala, Janek Frantzén, Maria Gardberg, Melissa Rahi, Kirsi Rautajoki, Matti Nykter, Ville Vuorinen and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Tomi KiviojaFaculty of Medicine and Health Technology, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland.
Jussi P PostiNeurocenter, Department of Neurosurgery and Turku Brain Injury Center, Turku University Hospital and University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Jussi SipiläDepartment of Neurology, Siun Sote, North Karelia Central Hospital, Joensuu, Finland.
Minna RauhalaFaculty of Medicine and Health Technology, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland.
Janek FrantzénDepartment of Neurosurgery, Turku University Hospital and University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Maria GardbergTurku University Hospital, Tyks Laboratories, Pathology and Institute of Biomedicine, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Melissa RahiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Turku University Hospital and University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Kirsi RautajokiProstate Cancer Research Center, Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University and Tays Cancer Center, Tampere, Finland.
Matti NykterFaculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University and Tays Cancer Center, Tampere, Finland.
Ville VuorinenDepartment of Neurosurgery, Turku University Hospital and University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Kristiina NordforsDepartment of Pediatrics, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland.
Hannu HaapasaloFimlab Laboratories Ltd., Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland.
Joonas HaapasaloDepartment of Neurosurgery, Tampere University Hospital and Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
Tampere University · FITurku University Hospital · FIUniversity of Turku · FITampere University Hospital · FIFimlab (Finland) · FITampere University · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and objectives: The objectives of this study were to investigate the prognostic value of primary symptoms and leading symptoms in adult patients with diffuse infiltrating glioma and to provide a clinical perspective for evaluating survival. Methods: This study included a retrospective cohort from two tertiary university hospitals ( Results: The most common primary symptoms were epileptic seizure (30.8% retrospective, 28.2% prospective), cognitive disorder (13.2% retrospective, 16.0% prospective), headache (8.6% retrospective, 12.8% prospective), and motor paresis (7.0% retrospective, 7.1% prospective). Symptoms that predicted better survival were epileptic seizure and visual or other sense-affecting symptom in the retrospective cohort and epileptic seizure and headache in the prospective cohort. Predictors of poor survival were cognitive disorder, motor dysfunction, sensory symptom, tumor hemorrhage, speech disorder and dizziness in the retrospective cohort and cognitive disorder, motor dysfunction, sensory symptom, and dizziness in the prospective cohort. Motor dysfunction served as an independent predictor of survival in a multivariate model (OR = 1.636). Conclusion: Primary and leading symptoms in diffuse gliomas are associated with prognoses in retrospective and prospective settings. Motor paresis was an independent prognostic factor for poor survival in multivariate analysis for grade 2-4 diffuse gliomas, especially in glioblastomas.

Indexed as

brain neoplasmcognitive disorderepilepsygliomaheadachemotor dysfunctionprognosissymptoms

Identifiers

PMID38239655
PMCPMC10794640
OpenAlexW4390585363

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.