Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38239619›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2023

Population health interventions for cardiometabolic diseases in primary care: a scoping review and RE-AIM evaluation of current practices.

Margot Rakers, Nicoline van Hattem, Sabine Plag, Niels Chavannes, Hendrikus J A van Os, Rimke C Vos

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. GARDE-Chat: a scalable, open-source platform for building and deploying health chatbots.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Margot RakersDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, Netherlands.
Nicoline van HattemDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, Netherlands.
Sabine PlagHealth Campus the Hague, Leiden University Medical Center, The Hague, Netherlands.
Niels ChavannesDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, Netherlands.
Hendrikus J A van OsDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, Netherlands.
Rimke C VosHealth Campus the Hague, Leiden University Medical Center, The Hague, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Cardiometabolic diseases (CMD) are the leading cause of death in high-income countries and are largely attributable to modifiable risk factors. Population health management (PHM) can effectively identify patient subgroups at high risk of CMD and address missed opportunities for preventive disease management. Guided by the Reach, Efficacy, Adoption, Implementation and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework, this scoping review of PHM interventions targeting patients in primary care at increased risk of CMD aims to describe the reported aspects for successful implementation. Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted across 14 databases to identify papers published between 2000 and 2023, using Arksey and O'Malley's framework for conducting scoping reviews. The RE-AIM framework was used to assess the implementation, documentation, and the population health impact score of the PHM interventions. Results: A total of 26 out of 1,100 studies were included, representing 21 unique PHM interventions. This review found insufficient reporting of most RE-AIM components. The RE-AIM evaluation showed that the included interventions could potentially reach a large audience and achieve their intended goals, but information on adoption and maintenance was often lacking. A population health impact score was calculated for six interventions ranging from 28 to 62%. Discussion: This review showed the promise of PHM interventions that could reaching a substantial number of participants and reducing CMD risk factors. However, to better assess the generalizability and scalability of these interventions there is a need for an improved assessment of adoption, implementation processes, and sustainability.

Indexed as

cardiometabolic diseasesmodifiable risk factorspopulation health impact scorepopulation health managementRE-AIM framework

Identifiers

PMID38239619
PMCPMC10794664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.