ArticleFrontiers in medicine2023
The clinical course of hospitalized COVID-19 patients and aggravation risk prediction models: a retrospective, multi-center Korean cohort study.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Understanding the clinical course and pivotal time points of COVID-19 aggravation is critical for enhancing patient monitoring. This retrospective, multi-center cohort study aims to identify these significant time points and associate them with potential risk factors, leveraging data from a sizable cohort with mild-to-moderate symptoms upon admission. Methods: This study included data from 1,696 COVID-19 patients with mild-to-moderate clinical severity upon admission across multiple hospitals in Daegu-Kyungpook Province (Daegu dataset) between February 18 and early March 2020 and 321 COVID-19 patients at Seoul Boramae Hospital (Boramae dataset) collected from February to July 2020. The approach involved: (1) identifying the optimal time point for aggravation using survival analyses with maximally selected rank statistics; (2) investigating the relationship between comorbidities and time to aggravation; and (3) developing prediction models through machine learning techniques. The models were validated internally among patients from the Daegu dataset and externally among patients from the Boramae dataset. Results: The Daegu dataset showed a mean age of 51.0 ± 19.6 years, with 8 days for aggravation and day 5 being identified as the pivotal point for survival. Contrary to previous findings, specific comorbidities had no notable impact on aggravation patterns. Prediction models utilizing factors including age and chest X-ray infiltration demonstrated promising performance, with the top model achieving an AUC of 0.827 in external validation for 5 days aggravation prediction. Conclusion: Our study highlights the crucial significance of the initial 5 days period post-admission in managing COVID-19 patients. The identification of this pivotal time frame, combined with our robust predictive models, provides valuable insights for early intervention strategies. This research underscores the potential of proactive monitoring and timely interventions in enhancing patient outcomes, particularly for those at risk of rapid aggravation. Our findings offer a meaningful contribution to understanding the COVID-19 clinical course and supporting healthcare providers in optimizing patient care and resource allocation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.