ArticleFrontiers in medicine2023
Evaluation of the corneal topography based on deep learning.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Orbscan IIz multimodal corneal topography dataset of anterior axial power maps with structured clinical parameters for unsupervised and self-supervised representation learning.Data in brief · 2026Article
- A Multimodal Multitask Artificial Intelligence Model for Orthokeratology Contact Lens Fitting: An Integrated Framework to Enhance Lens Centration and Myopia Control Effect.Ophthalmology science · 2026Article
- An Explainable AI Framework for Corneal Imaging Interpretation and Refractive Surgery Decision Support.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Standardized Corneal Topography-Driven AI for Orthokeratology Fitting: A Hybrid Deep/Machine Learning Approach With Enhanced Generalizability.Translational vision science & technology · 2025Article
- Bibliometric analysis of research on the application of deep learning to ophthalmology.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- AI-assisted automated interpretation of corneal topography in orthokeratology patients: enhancing diagnostic precision and efficiency.International journal of ophthalmology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The current study designed a unique type of corneal topography evaluation method based on deep learning and traditional image processing algorithms. The type of corneal topography of patients was evaluated through the segmentation of important medical zones and the calculation of relevant medical indicators of orthokeratology (OK) lenses. Methods: The clinical data of 1,302 myopic subjects was collected retrospectively. A series of neural network-based U-Net was used to segment the pupil and the treatment zone in the corneal topography, and the decentration, effective defocusing contact range, and other indicators were calculated according to the image processing algorithm. The type of corneal topography was evaluated according to the evaluation criteria given by the optometrist. Finally, the method described in this article was used to evaluate the type of corneal topography and compare it with the type classified by the optometrist. Results: When the important medical zones in the corneal topography were segmented, the precision and recall of the treatment zone reached 0.9587 and 0.9459, respectively, and the precision and recall of the pupil reached 0.9771 and 0.9712. Finally, the method described in this article was used to evaluate the type of corneal topography. When the reviewed findings based on deep learning and image processing algorithms were compared to the type of corneal topography marked by the professional optometrist, they demonstrated high accuracy with more than 98%. Conclusion: The current study provided an effective and accurate deep learning algorithm to evaluate the type of corneal topography. The deep learning algorithm played an auxiliary role in the OK lens fitting, which could help optometrists select the parameters of OK lenses effectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.