ArticleCureus2023
Fenestration and Dehiscence in Human Maxillary Alveolar Bone: An In Silico Study Using the Finite Element Method.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Using swin UNETR deep model for automated detection of alveolar bone fenestration/dehiscence in CBCT.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Assessment of evidence from teeth and the alveolar bone of skulls.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Comparative evaluation of four traction scenarios on a labially impacted dilacerated maxillary central incisor: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.BMC oral health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionFenestration and dehiscence are alveolar bone defects. Although not considered a pathology, these alveolar bone defects end up influencing dental treatment, such as surgeries, mainly periodontal, and therefore must be considered during treatment planning. However, currently, little is known about the biomechanical origin of these bone formations. The aim of the study was to use the finite element method (FEM) to test hypotheses of predictive factors for fenestrations and dehiscence in human alveolar bone.
methodsA FEM simulation of the action of functional, parafunctional, and orthodontic occlusal loads on the upper central incisor and upper canine was performed. For the simulation, a three-dimensional model of an adult human skull, fully dented and with intact bone structure, was constructed from computed tomography images. The buccal alveolar bone lamina was evaluated considering the calculation of equivalent stresses, as well as maximum principal stresses.
resultsThe action of functional and parafunctional forces on the incisal edges and the orthodontic force on the buccal face of the upper central incisor and upper canine teeth generated tensions at different levels of magnitude in the buccal bone lamina, varying in regions, at all levels of strength. Changing levels of force magnitude resulted in variations in relation to the level of deformation.
conclusionThe computational simulation using the FEM was able to identify a difference in stress in the alveolar bone tissue in each of the applied forces. The difference in stresses obtained may suggest the formation of dehiscence or fenestration in the region studied.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.