Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38239510›Full record

ArticleCureus2023

Total Intravenous Anesthesia Compared to Inhalational Anesthesia in Patients Undergoing Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair.

Christopher Rennie, Katerina N Futch, Jane C Brennan, Benjamin M Petre, Sohail Zaidi, Justin J Turcotte, Andrea H Johnson, Daniel E Redziniak

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 62% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Christopher RennieDr. Kiran C. Patel College of Osteopathic Medicine, Nova Southeastern University, Tampa, USA.
Katerina N FutchDr. Kiran C. Patel College of Osteopathic Medicine, Nova Southeastern University, Tampa, USA.
Jane C BrennanOrthopedic Research, Anne Arundel Medical Center, Annapolis, USA.
Benjamin M PetreOrthopedic Surgery, Anne Arundel Medical Center, Annapolis, USA.
Sohail ZaidiAnesthesiology, Anne Arundel Medical Center, Annapolis, USA.
Justin J TurcotteOrthopedic Research, Anne Arundel Medical Center, Annapolis, USA.
Andrea H JohnsonOrthopedics, Anne Arundel Medical Center, Annapolis, USA.
Daniel E RedziniakOrthopedic Surgery, Anne Arundel Medical Center, Annapolis, USA.
Nova Southeastern University · USAnne Arundel Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Inhalation anesthesia (IA) and total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) are common general anesthesia techniques. During rotator cuff repair (RCR), an interscalene block is beneficial for intraoperative and early postoperative pain control. This study aimed to evaluate postoperative outcomes and opioid usage in patients undergoing arthroscopic RCR with an interscalene block and either IA or TIVA. Methodology A retrospective observational study was performed of 478 patients undergoing RCR at a single institution. Demographics, surgical details, intra and postoperative medications, and 90-day outcomes were collected. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate differences between groups. Results In total, 309 (64.6%) patients received IA and 169 (35.3%) received TIVA. Patients receiving IA were more likely to have comorbidities, such as diabetes (p = 0.002), sleep apnea (p = 0.006), gastroesophageal reflux disease (p < 0.001), and hypertension (p < 0.001). After adjusting for differences between groups in the multivariate analysis, patients who received TIVA had significantly shorter surgical time (β = -14.85, p < 0.001) and perioperative time (β = -21.01, p < 0.001) and significantly lower first post-anesthesia care unit Pasero opioid-induced sedation scores (β = -0.022, p = 0.040). Patients who received TIVA were less likely to receive intraoperative narcotics (odds ratio = 0.38; p = 0.031). Conclusions TIVA appears to be a safe and effective anesthetic for patients undergoing arthroscopic RCR. TIVA is a potentially beneficial alternative to IA for this patient population.

Indexed as

arthroscopic rotator cuff repairinhalational anesthesianarcotic usepostoperative outcomespostoperative paintotal intravenous anesthesia (tiva)

Identifiers

PMID38239510
PMCPMC10795481
OpenAlexW4389949686

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.