Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38239470›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2023

Investigating pupillometry to detect preoperative anxiety: a pilot study.

Jason Richez, Pierre-Raphaël Rothschild, Christophe Baillard, Gilles Guerrier

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04154410 (Prospective Observational Study of the Non Invasive Objective Assessment of Pre-operative Anxiety Using the Heart Rate Variability and the Pupillary Reflex Measurement), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 100% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04154410 completednot on this map

Prospective Observational Study of the Non Invasive Objective Assessment of Pre-operative Anxiety Using the Heart Rate Variability and the Pupillary Reflex Measurement

TypeobservationalSponsorAssistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisRan2022 to 2022Enrolled71ConditionsEligible for Day Case SurgeryArmsAnalgesia Nociception Index, algiscan
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jason RichezDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Hopital Cochin, Assistance Publique-Hopitaux de Paris, Paris, France.
Pierre-Raphaël RothschildDepartment of Ophtalmology, Hôpital Cochin, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.
Christophe BaillardDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Hopital Cochin, Assistance Publique-Hopitaux de Paris, Paris, France.
Gilles GuerrierDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Hopital Cochin, Assistance Publique-Hopitaux de Paris, Paris, France.
Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FRHôpital Cochin · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Guidelines from the European Society of Anesthesia (ESA) insist on the importance of preoperative anxiety management. However, its assessment currently relies on questionnaires that are long to submit and sometimes difficult to interpret. Exploring the balance between sympathetic and parasympathetic neural systems through the use of pupillometry is a promising path to identify anxiety and thus provides an objective and reproducible assessment tool. A single-center prospective observational study was conducted in a population of ambulatory ophthalmological surgery patients. Preoperative anxiety was assessed using the Surgical Fear Questionnaire (SFQ). Measurements were taken using an Algiscan

Indexed as

cataract surgerycoefficient of variationobjective assessmentpre-operative anxietypupillometry

Identifiers

PMID38239470
PMCPMC10795181
OpenAlexW4390540927

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.