ArticleEuropean heart journal. Case reports2024
Cryoballoon ablation of peri-mitral atrial flutter refractory to radiofrequency ablation: a case report.
Article in European heart journal. Case reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The radiofrequency catheter ablation of peri-mitral atrial flutter is occasionally difficult, mostly due to epicardial or intramural conduction on the mitral isthmus (MI). However, cryoballoon ablation (CBA) of peri-mitral atrial flutter refractory to radiofrequency ablation has not been reported. Case summary: We report a case of a 66-year-old male patient who experienced a recurrence of atypical atrial flutter and underwent the sixth catheter ablation. The activation and entrainment maps showed that this atypical atrial flutter (AFL) was peri-mitral AFL via pathways other than endocardial conduction in the MI. Previous radiofrequency catheter ablation attempts on the MI line, including endocardial, coronary sinus, and epicardial ablations, failed to achieve a bidirectional block of the MI. In this case, we selected CBA for the MI area and successfully achieved a bidirectional block of the MI. Discussion: Although using CBA in the MI is off-label, it could be safely implemented using CARTOUNIVU™. We attributed the success of the bidirectional block of the MI in this case to the crimping of the northern hemisphere of the CBA to the mitral isthmus area, which resulted in the formation of a broad, uniform, and deep ablation lesion site.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.