Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38239071›Full record

ArticleThe International journal of eating disorders2024

Understanding community provider practices in diagnosing and treating atypical anorexia nervosa: A mixed methods study.

Sarah Johnson-Munguia, Angeline R Bottera, Irina Vanzhula, Kelsie T Forbush, Sara R Gould, Sonakshi Negi, Marianna L Thomeczek, Alexa M L'Insalata, Emily E Like, Anjali R Sharma and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The International journal of eating disorders, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Clinician Practices in Determining Expected Body Weights Across Eating Disorders: A Mixed Methods Study.European eating disorders review : the journal of the Eating Disorders Association · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sarah Johnson-MunguiaDepartment of Psychology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6663-3711
Angeline R BotteraDepartment of Psychology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0687-6623
Irina VanzhulaDepartment of Psychology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8323-1290
Kelsie T ForbushDepartment of Psychology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5900-4204
Sara R GouldDepartment of Pediatrics, Children's Mercy, Kansas City, Missouri, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5651-3516
Sonakshi NegiDepartment of Psychology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, USA.ORCID 0009-0002-8277-2962
Marianna L ThomeczekDepartment of Psychology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7098-8697
Alexa M L'InsalataDepartment of Psychology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6279-9079
Emily E LikeDepartment of Psychology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, USA.ORCID 0009-0003-2888-6421
Anjali R SharmaDepartment of Psychology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, USA.ORCID 0009-0008-3357-6774
R William MorganDepartment of Psychology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0188-2709
Samiya RasheedDepartment of Psychology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, USA.ORCID 0009-0007-9672-4976
University of Kansas · USChildren's Mercy Hospital · US

Funding

NRSA Training CoreTL1TR002368 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI Jennifer Lynn Goldman, NICOLE L NOLLEN · 2017 to 2026
$4.0M
Minimizing Fall-Related Injury in Older Adults: a motor learning approachR21AG073892 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI SOSNOFF, JACOB J. · 2021 to 2022
$429k
NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR002368NIA NIH HHS R21 AG073892
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThere is a lack of consensus in defining "significant weight loss" when diagnosing atypical anorexia nervosa (atypical AN) and no guidelines exist for setting target weight (TW). The current study aimed to identify community providers' practices related to the diagnosis of atypical AN and the determination of TW. A secondary aim was to evaluate whether professional discipline impacted "significant weight loss" definitions.

methodA variety of providers (N = 141; 96.4% female) completed an online survey pertaining to diagnostic and treatment practices with atypical AN. Descriptive statistics were computed to characterize provider-based practices and Fisher's exact tests were used to test for differences in diagnostic practices by professional discipline. Thematic analysis was used to examine open-ended questions.

resultsMost (63.97%) providers diagnosed atypical AN in the absence of any weight loss if other AN criteria were met, but doctoral-level psychologists and medical professionals were less likely to do so compared to nutritional or other mental health professionals. Most providers found weight gain was only sometimes necessary for atypical AN recovery. Qualitative responses revealed providers found atypical AN to be a stigmatizing label that was not taken seriously. Providers preferred to use an individualized approach focused on behaviors, rather than weight when diagnosing and treating atypical AN. DISCUSSION: Lack of diagnostic clarity and concrete treatment guidelines for atypical AN may result in substantial deviations from the DSM-5-TR criteria in real-world practice. Clinically useful diagnostic definitions for restrictive eating disorders and evidence-based treatment guidelines for TW and/or other relevant recovery metrics are needed. PUBLIC SIGNIFICANCE: The current study found variability in how community providers diagnose and determine target recovery weight for atypical anorexia nervosa (atypical AN). Many providers viewed the diagnosis of atypical AN as stigmatizing and preferred to focus on behaviors, rather than weight. This study underscores the importance of creating a clinically useful diagnostic definition and guidelines for recovery for atypical AN backed by empirical evidence that providers may implement in practice.

Indexed as

Anorexia NervosaDiagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental DisordersFemaleHumansMaleWeight Lossatypical anorexia nervosadiagnosisgoal weightOSFEDprovider practicesrecoveryrestrictive eating disorder

Identifiers

PMID38239071
PMCPMC11018496
OpenAlexW4391031811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.