Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38238898›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association2024

Development and preliminary evaluation of a novel procedure for creation of an ileal conduit stoma aimed at preventing parastomal hernia.

Toshiaki Tanaka, Koji Yamasaki, Seisuke Nofuji, Takeshi Maehana, Tetsuya Shindo, Yuki Kyoda, Kohei Hashimoto, Ko Kobayashi, Naoya Masumori

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Toshiaki TanakaDepartment of Urology, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-1199-9302
Koji YamasakiDepartment of Urology, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
Seisuke NofujiDepartment of Urology, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
Takeshi MaehanaDepartment of Urology, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-2687-1923
Tetsuya ShindoDepartment of Urology, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-4990-8330
Yuki KyodaDepartment of Urology, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
Kohei HashimotoDepartment of Urology, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-0873-4642
Ko KobayashiDepartment of Urology, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-6995-6930
Naoya MasumoriDepartment of Urology, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-6324-0739
Sapporo Medical University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesOur previous study suggested that the operative procedure is critical for the development of parastomal hernia. We developed a novel procedure for the creation of an ileal conduit stoma to prevent parastomal hernia. Herein we evaluate the efficacy and safety of the procedure.

methodsA total of 113 Japanese patients underwent radical cystectomy and ileal conduit diversion for bladder cancer from January 2017 through December 2021 at our institution. After excluding those with incomplete data, 103 patients consisting of 46 (44.7%) with the conventional procedure and 57 (55.3%) with the novel procedure were consecutively enrolled. The main points of the novel procedure are as follows: (1) the passage of the ileal conduit is ≤2.4 cm in diameter in principle; (2) the posterior rectus sheath and peritoneum are vertically incised 2 cm laterally from the middle of the stoma site to make an oblique passage for the ileal conduit; and (3) the anterior rectus sheath and posterior rectus sheath with peritoneum are fixed to the ileal conduit separately.

resultsRadiography-based parastomal hernia was observed in 11 patients (10.7%) with a median follow-up of 22.0 months. The incidences of parastomal hernia were 3.5% and 19.6% in the novel and the conventional procedure groups, respectively (p = 0.011). The former had a significantly lower cumulative incidence of parastomal hernia (p = 0.008, log-rank test). No specific complications associated with the procedure were observed.

conclusionsThe results of the preliminary cohort study suggest that the novel procedure is safe and effective for the prevention of parastomal hernia.

Indexed as

CystectomyIncisional HerniaSurgical StomasUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsUrinary DiversionAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansJapanMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesTreatment Outcomebladder cancerileal conduitparastomal herniastomaurinary diversion

Identifiers

PMID38238898
PMCPMC11524112
OpenAlexW4391033779

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.