ArticleBreast cancer research : BCR2024
Digital image analysis and machine learning-assisted prediction of neoadjuvant chemotherapy response in triple-negative breast cancer.
Article in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Automated scoring methods for quantitative interpretation of Tumour infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in breast cancer: a systematic review.BMC cancer · 2024Pooled it
- Beyond pCR Prediction: Subtype-Specific Artificial Intelligence for Treatment Tailoring in Breast Cancer Neoadjuvant Therapy.Cancers · 2026Review
- World Health Organization classification of tumours of the breast 6th edition 2026.Histopathology · 2026Review
- Development and evaluation of an explainable machine learning selection pipeline for predicting neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy response in locally advanced rectal cancer.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Article
- Review
- Estimating tumour immune infiltration: methodological convergence across histology and spatial technologies.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Review
- Deep learning-driven recognition of panoramic tumor microenvironment features in H&E sections and its application.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2026Review
- Etiology of polyploid giant cancer cells: a new frontier in cancer biology.Cancer cell international · 2026Review
- Spatial architecture of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes adds predictive value beyond stromal TIL density for neoadjuvant response in triple-negative breast cancer.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence for triple-negative breast cancer from imaging to multi-omics.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- A Retrospective Analysis of a Serum Multi-Biomarker (CA153, TSGF, and CYFRA 21-1) Logistic Regression Model for Predicting Pathologic Complete Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer.Breast cancer (Dove Medical Press) · 2026Article
- Development and validation of a pathomics-driven machine learning model for individualized prediction of neoadjuvant chemotherapy response and early recurrence in HR-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Chemoimmunomodulation in triple negative breast cancer: a key to maximizing anti-PD-1 chemoimmunotherapeutic efficacy.Oncoimmunology · 2025Review
- Morphological analysis of tumor microenvironment in HER2-positive breast cancer: predicting response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy on histopathological images.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2025Article
- Assessment of Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Interobserver Variability and Contributing Factors.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Tailored therapies for triple-negative breast cancer: current landscape and future perceptions.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2025Review
- Deep learning predicts the effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for patients with triple negative breast cancer.Journal of pathology informatics · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence-Based Pathology to Assist Prediction of Neoadjuvant Therapy Responses for Breast Cancer.Cancer medicine · 2025Review
- Challenges and opportunities for the next generation of computational tumor models.PLoS biology · 2025Article
- Quantifying the tumour vasculature environment from CD-31 immunohistochemistry images of breast cancer using deep learning based semantic segmentation.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
10 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPathological complete response (pCR) is associated with favorable prognosis in patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). However, only 30-40% of TNBC patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) show pCR, while the remaining 60-70% show residual disease (RD). The role of the tumor microenvironment in NAC response in patients with TNBC remains unclear. In this study, we developed a machine learning-based two-step pipeline to distinguish between various histological components in hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained whole slide images (WSIs) of TNBC tissue biopsies and to identify histological features that can predict NAC response.
methodsH&E-stained WSIs of treatment-naïve biopsies from 85 patients (51 with pCR and 34 with RD) of the model development cohort and 79 patients (41 with pCR and 38 with RD) of the validation cohort were separated through a stratified eightfold cross-validation strategy for the first step and leave-one-out cross-validation strategy for the second step. A tile-level histology label prediction pipeline and four machine-learning classifiers were used to analyze 468,043 tiles of WSIs. The best-trained classifier used 55 texture features from each tile to produce a probability profile during testing. The predicted histology classes were used to generate a histology classification map of the spatial distributions of different tissue regions. A patient-level NAC response prediction pipeline was trained with features derived from paired histology classification maps. The top graph-based features capturing the relevant spatial information across the different histological classes were provided to the radial basis function kernel support vector machine (rbfSVM) classifier for NAC treatment response prediction.
resultsThe tile-level prediction pipeline achieved 86.72% accuracy for histology class classification, while the patient-level pipeline achieved 83.53% NAC response (pCR vs. RD) prediction accuracy of the model development cohort. The model was validated with an independent cohort with tile histology validation accuracy of 83.59% and NAC prediction accuracy of 81.01%. The histological class pairs with the strongest NAC response predictive ability were tumor and tumor tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes for pCR and microvessel density and polyploid giant cancer cells for RD.
conclusionOur machine learning pipeline can robustly identify clinically relevant histological classes that predict NAC response in TNBC patients and may help guide patient selection for NAC treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.