Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38238764›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2024

Drivers for low-acuity pediatric emergency department visits in two tertiary hospitals in Switzerland: a cross-sectional, questionnaire-based study.

Manon Jaboyedoff, Carl Starvaggi, Joan-Carles Suris, Claudia E Kuehni, Mario Gehri, Kristina Keitel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Manon JaboyedoffDepartment Women-Mother-Child, Service of Pediatrics, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland. manon.jaboyedoff@chuv.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0063-1510
Carl StarvaggiDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9967-6857
Joan-Carles SurisDepartment Women-Mother-Child, Service of Pediatrics, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5570-6615
Claudia E KuehniInstitute of Social and Preventive Medicine (ISPM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8957-2002
Mario GehriDepartment Women-Mother-Child, Service of Pediatrics, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9415-5040
Kristina KeitelDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9663-3843

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeLow-acuity pediatric emergency department (PED) visits are frequent in high-income countries and have a negative impact on patient care at the individual and health system levels. Knowing what drives low-acuity PED visits is crucial to inform adaptations in health care delivery. We aimed to identify factors associated with low-acuity PED visits in Switzerland, including socioeconomic status, demographic features, and medical resources of families.

methodsWe conducted a prospective, questionnaire-based study in the PEDs of two Swiss tertiary care hospitals, Bern and Lausanne. We invited all consecutive children and their caregiver attending the PED during data collection times representative of the overall PED consultation structure (e.g. day/night, weekdays/weekends) to complete a questionnaire on demographic features, socioeconomic status, and medical resources. We collected medical and administrative data about the visit and defined low-acuity visits as those meeting all of the following criteria: (1) triage category 4 or 5 on the Australasian Triage Scale, (2) no imaging or laboratory test performed, and (3) discharge home. We used a binary multiple logistic regression model to identify factors associated with low-acuity visits.

resultsWe analysed 778 PED visits (September 2019 to July 2020). Most children visiting our PEDs had a designated primary care provider (92%), with only 6% not having seen them during the last year. Fifty-five per cent of caregivers had asked for medical advice before coming to the PED. The proportion of low-acuity visits was 58%. Low-acuity visits were associated with caregiver's difficulties paying bills (aOR 2.6, 95% CI 1.6 - 4.4), having already visited a PED in the last 6 months (aOR 1.7, 95% CI 1.1 - 2.5) but not with parental education status, nor parental country of birth, parental employment status or absence of family network.

conclusionEconomic precariousness is an important driver for low-acuity PED visits in Switzerland, a high-income country with compulsory health coverage where most children have a designated primary care provider and a regular pediatric follow-up. Primary care providers and PEDs should screen families for economic precariousness and offer anticipatory guidance and connect those in financial need to social support.

Indexed as

Emergency Room VisitsEmergency Service, HospitalChildCross-Sectional StudiesHospitals, PediatricHumansProspective StudiesSurveys and QuestionnairesSwitzerlandTertiary Care CentersHealthcare useLow-acuityNon-urgentPediatric emergency departmentSocioeconomic status

Identifiers

PMID38238764
PMCPMC10797974

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.