Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38238735›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2024

"Hospitals respond to demand. Public health needs to respond to risk": health system lessons from a case study of northern Queensland's COVID-19 surveillance and response.

Alexandra Edelman, Tammy Allen, Susan Devine, Paul F Horwood, Emma S McBryde, Julie Mudd, Jeffrey Warner, Stephanie M Topp

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Alexandra EdelmanMenzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Alice Springs, Northern Territory, Australia.
Tammy AllenCollege of Public Health, Medical and Veterinary Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia.
Susan DevineCollege of Public Health, Medical and Veterinary Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia.
Paul F HorwoodCollege of Public Health, Medical and Veterinary Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia.
Emma S McBrydeAustralian Institute of Tropical Health and Medicine, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia.
Julie MuddCollege of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia.
Jeffrey WarnerCollege of Public Health, Medical and Veterinary Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia.
Stephanie M ToppCollege of Public Health, Medical and Veterinary Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia. stephanie.topp@jcu.edu.au.

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council GNT1173004
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe vast region of northern Queensland (NQ) in Australia experiences poorer health outcomes and a disproportionate burden of communicable diseases compared with urban populations in Australia. This study examined the governance of COVID-19 surveillance and response in NQ to identify strengths and opportunities for improvement.

methodsThe manuscript presents an analysis of one case-unit within a broader case study project examining systems for surveillance and response for COVID-19 in NQ. Data were collected between October 2020-December 2021 comprising 47 interviews with clinical and public health staff, document review, and observation in organisational settings. Thematic analysis produced five key themes.

resultsStudy findings highlight key strengths of the COVID-19 response, including rapid implementation of response measures, and the relative autonomy of NQ's Public Health Units to lead logistical decision-making. However, findings also highlight limitations and fragility of the public health system more generally, including unclear accountabilities, constraints on local community engagement, and workforce and other resourcing shortfalls. These were framed by state-wide regulatory and organisational incentives that prioritise clinical health care rather than disease prevention, health protection, and health promotion. Although NQ mobilised an effective COVID-19 response, findings suggest that NQ public health systems are marked by fragility, calling into question the region's preparedness for future pandemic events and other public health crises.

conclusionsStudy findings highlight an urgent need to improve governance, resourcing, and political priority of public health in NQ to address unmet needs and ongoing threats.

Indexed as

COVID-19AustraliaHospitalsHumansPublic HealthQueenslandAustraliaCOVID-19GovernanceHealth systemsPandemic preparednessPublic healthQueensland

Identifiers

PMID38238735
PMCPMC10797896

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.