ArticleBMC medical imaging2024
Recognition of eye diseases based on deep neural networks for transfer learning and improved D-S evidence theory.
Article in BMC medical imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Advances in AI-Driven EEG Analysis for Neurological and Oculomotor Disorders: A Systematic Review.Biosensors · 2025Pooled it
- Design of Unattended Rain and Snow Protection Device for Total Station Based on D-S Evidence Fusion.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHuman vision has inspired significant advancements in computer vision, yet the human eye is prone to various silent eye diseases. With the advent of deep learning, computer vision for detecting human eye diseases has gained prominence, but most studies have focused only on a limited number of eye diseases.
resultsOur model demonstrated a reduction in inherent bias and enhanced robustness. The fused network achieved an Accuracy of 0.9237, Kappa of 0.878, F1 Score of 0.914 (95% CI [0.875-0.954]), Precision of 0.945 (95% CI [0.928-0.963]), Recall of 0.89 (95% CI [0.821-0.958]), and an AUC value of ROC at 0.987. These metrics are notably higher than those of comparable studies.
conclusionsOur deep neural network-based model exhibited improvements in eye disease recognition metrics over models from peer research, highlighting its potential application in this field.
methodsIn deep learning-based eye recognition, to improve the learning efficiency of the model, we train and fine-tune the network by transfer learning. In order to eliminate the decision bias of the models and improve the credibility of the decisions, we propose a model decision fusion method based on the D-S theory. However, D-S theory is an incomplete and conflicting theory, we improve and eliminate the existed paradoxes, propose the improved D-S evidence theory(ID-SET), and apply it to the decision fusion of eye disease recognition models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.