Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38238632›Full record

GuidelineDocumenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology2024

ISCEV and IPS guideline for the full-field stimulus test (FST).

J K Jolly, J R Grigg, A M McKendrick, K Fujinami, A V Cideciyan, D A Thompson, C Matsumoto, R Asaoka, C Johnson, M W Dul and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readPractice Guideline
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Guideline in Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Clinical endpoints special session, ISCEV 2025, Utrecht.Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. The role of full-field stimulus threshold in evaluating Bietti crystalline dystrophy.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 12 institutions in 4 countries.

J K JollyVision and Eye Research Institute, Anglia Ruskin University, Young Street, Cambridge, CB1 2LZ, UK. info@jvisionsci.com.ORCID 0000-0001-9878-4621
J R GriggSave Sight Institute, Specialty of Clinical Ophthalmology and Eye Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6763-8119
A M McKendrickLions Eye Institute, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1972-1222
K FujinamiLaboratory of Visual Physiology, National Institute of Sensory Organs, National Hospital Organization Tokyo Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-4248-0033
A V CideciyanCenter for Hereditary Retinal Degenerations, Scheie Eye Institute, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2018-0905
D A ThompsonThe Tony Kriss Visual Electrophysiology Unit, Clinical and Academic, Department of Ophthalmology, Sight and Sound Centre, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Trust, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5491-3911
C MatsumotoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Kindai University, Osakasayama, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-2197-7561
R AsaokaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Seirei Hamamatsu General Hospital, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-8399-8210
C JohnsonDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
M W DulDepartment of Biological and Vision Science, College of Optometry, State University of New York, New York, USA.
P H ArtesFaculty of Health, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3574-8396
A G RobsonInstitute of Ophthalmology, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8391-6123
Anglia Ruskin University · GBGreat Ormond Street Hospital · GBKindai University · JPLions Eye Institute · AUMoorfields Eye Hospital · GBPenn Presbyterian Medical Center · USShizuoka University · JPSUNY College of Optometry · USThe University of Sydney · AUTokyo Medical Center · JPUniversity of Iowa · USUniversity of Plymouth · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The full-field stimulus test (FST) is a psychophysical technique designed for the measurement of visual function in low vision. The method involves the use of a ganzfeld stimulator, as used in routine full-field electroretinography, to deliver full-field flashes of light. This guideline was developed jointly by the International Society for Clinical Electrophysiology of Vision (ISCEV) and Imaging and Perimetry Society (IPS) in order to provide technical information, promote consistency of testing and reporting, and encourage convergence of methods for FST. It is intended to aid practitioners and guide the formulation of FST protocols, with a view to future standardisation.

Indexed as

ElectroretinographyVisual Field TestsPhotic StimulationSocieties, MedicalVision, OcularClinical standardsImaging and Perimetry SocietyInternational Society for Clinical Electrophysiology of VisionPhotopicScotopicSensitivityThreshold

Identifiers

PMID38238632
PMCPMC10879267
OpenAlexW4390986714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.