Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38238576›Full record

SynthesisEye (London, England)2024

Predicting systemic diseases in fundus images: systematic review of setting, reporting, bias, and models' clinical availability in deep learning studies.

Yitong Li, Ruiheng Zhang, Li Dong, Xuhan Shi, Wenda Zhou, Haotian Wu, Heyan Li, Chuyao Yu, Wenbin Wei

Open access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Eye (London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yitong Li *Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Key Laboratory of Intraocular Tumor Diagnosis and Treatment, Beijing Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences Key Lab, Medical Artificial Intelligence Research and Verification Key Laboratory of the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4432-2936
Ruiheng Zhang *Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Key Laboratory of Intraocular Tumor Diagnosis and Treatment, Beijing Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences Key Lab, Medical Artificial Intelligence Research and Verification Key Laboratory of the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Li Dong *Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Key Laboratory of Intraocular Tumor Diagnosis and Treatment, Beijing Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences Key Lab, Medical Artificial Intelligence Research and Verification Key Laboratory of the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0120-5756
Xuhan ShiBeijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Key Laboratory of Intraocular Tumor Diagnosis and Treatment, Beijing Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences Key Lab, Medical Artificial Intelligence Research and Verification Key Laboratory of the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Wenda ZhouBeijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Key Laboratory of Intraocular Tumor Diagnosis and Treatment, Beijing Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences Key Lab, Medical Artificial Intelligence Research and Verification Key Laboratory of the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Haotian WuBeijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Key Laboratory of Intraocular Tumor Diagnosis and Treatment, Beijing Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences Key Lab, Medical Artificial Intelligence Research and Verification Key Laboratory of the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Heyan LiBeijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Key Laboratory of Intraocular Tumor Diagnosis and Treatment, Beijing Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences Key Lab, Medical Artificial Intelligence Research and Verification Key Laboratory of the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Chuyao YuBeijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Key Laboratory of Intraocular Tumor Diagnosis and Treatment, Beijing Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences Key Lab, Medical Artificial Intelligence Research and Verification Key Laboratory of the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Wenbin WeiBeijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Key Laboratory of Intraocular Tumor Diagnosis and Treatment, Beijing Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences Key Lab, Medical Artificial Intelligence Research and Verification Key Laboratory of the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China. weiwenbintr@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2386-0989
Beijing Tongren Hospital · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 82141128
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAnalyzing fundus images with deep learning techniques is promising for screening systematic diseases. However, the quality of the rapidly increasing number of studies was variable and lacked systematic evaluation.

objectiveTo systematically review all the articles that aimed to predict systemic parameters and conditions using fundus image and deep learning, assessing their performance, and providing suggestions that would enable translation into clinical practice.

methodsTwo major electronic databases (MEDLINE and EMBASE) were searched until August 22, 2023, with keywords 'deep learning' and 'fundus'. Studies using deep learning and fundus images to predict systematic parameters were included, and assessed in four aspects: study characteristics, transparent reporting, risk of bias, and clinical availability. Transparent reporting was assessed by the TRIPOD statement, while the risk of bias was assessed by PROBAST.

results4969 articles were identified through systematic research. Thirty-one articles were included in the review. A variety of vascular and non-vascular diseases can be predicted by fundus images, including diabetes and related diseases (19%), sex (22%) and age (19%). Most of the studies focused on developed countries. The models' reporting was insufficient in determining sample size and missing data treatment according to the TRIPOD. Full access to datasets and code was also under-reported. 1/31(3.2%) study was classified as having a low risk of bias overall, whereas 30/31(96.8%) were classified as having a high risk of bias according to the PROBAST. 5/31(16.1%) of studies used prospective external validation cohorts. Only two (6.4%) described the study's calibration. The number of publications by year increased significantly from 2018 to 2023. However, only two models (6.5%) were applied to the device, and no model has been applied in clinical.

conclusionDeep learning fundus images have shown great potential in predicting systematic conditions in clinical situations. Further work needs to be done to improve the methodology and clinical application.

Indexed as

Deep LearningFundus OculiHumansRetinal Diseases

Identifiers

PMID38238576
PMCPMC11076532
OpenAlexW4390973695

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.