ArticleUpdates in surgery2024
The impact of delayed closure of ileostomy on postoperative complications in patients with Crohn's disease: a case-matched study.
Article in Updates in surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Ileostomy creation is a common procedure to mitigate postoperative complications in Crohn's disease (CD) patients. However, the optimal timing for ileostomy closure remains controversial. This study aims to investigate whether delayed ileostomy closure (> 6 months post formation) affects postoperative complications compared to early closure (≤ 6 months post formation). Consecutive CD patients who underwent ileostomy reversal at a tertiary care center between January 1, 2013, and December 1, 2021, were included. The study compared patients who underwent early ileostomy closure to matched patients undergoing delayed ileostomy closure. The 90-day postoperative complications were compared between the two groups. The study included 352 eligible patients for ileostomy reversion. Our data showed that patients undergoing delayed ileostomy closure had higher incidence of ileostomy-related infectious complications (12% vs. 4%, p = 0.008), a longer postoperative hospital stay (10 days with an IQR of 7-12 days versus 8 days with an IQR of 7-11 days, p = 0.024), and increased rate of ileus (28% versus 15%, p = 0.003). There were 256 patients included after 1:1 propensity score matching. The results revealed no significant differences in postoperative hospital stay, infectious or non-infectious complications except for a statistically significant increase in the incidence of ileus in the delayed closure group (p = 0.01). Patients undergoing delayed ileostomy closure has similar outcomes to early closure in terms of postoperative complications, except for a higher incidence of ileus.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.