Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38238528›Full record

Trial reportBehavior research methods2024

The effectiveness of warning statements in reducing careless responding in crowdsourced online surveys.

Florian Brühlmann, Zgjim Memeti, Lena F Aeschbach, Sebastian A C Perrig, Klaus Opwis

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Behavior research methods, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
12.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Florian BrühlmannCenter for General Psychology and Methodology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Basel, Missionsstrasse 62a, 4055, Basel, Switzerland. florian.bruehlmann@unibas.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8945-3273
Zgjim MemetiCenter for General Psychology and Methodology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Basel, Missionsstrasse 62a, 4055, Basel, Switzerland.
Lena F AeschbachCenter for General Psychology and Methodology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Basel, Missionsstrasse 62a, 4055, Basel, Switzerland.
Sebastian A C PerrigCenter for General Psychology and Methodology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Basel, Missionsstrasse 62a, 4055, Basel, Switzerland.
Klaus OpwisCenter for General Psychology and Methodology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Basel, Missionsstrasse 62a, 4055, Basel, Switzerland.
University of Basel · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Carelessness or insufficient effort responding is a widespread problem in online research, with estimates ranging from 3% to almost 50% of participants in online surveys being inattentive. While detecting carelessness has been subject to multiple studies, the factors that reduce or prevent carelessness are not as well understood. Initial evidence suggests that warning statements prior to study participation may reduce carelessness, but there is a lack of conclusive high-powered studies. This preregistered randomized controlled experiment aimed to test the effectiveness of a warning statement and an improved implementation of a warning statement in reducing participant inattention. A study with 812 participants recruited on Amazon Mechanical Turk was conducted. Results suggest that presenting a warning statement is not effective in reducing carelessness. However, requiring participants to actively type the warning statement statistically significantly reduced carelessness as measured with self-reported diligence, even-odd consistency, psychometric synonyms and antonyms, and individual response variability. The active warning statements also led to statistically significantly more attrition and potentially deterred those who were likely to be careless from even participating in this study. We show that the current standard practice of implementing warning statements is ineffective and novel methods to prevent and deter carelessness are needed.

Indexed as

CrowdsourcingInternetSurveys and QuestionnairesAdultAttentionFemaleHumansMaleCarelessnessData qualityInattentionInsufficient effort respondingSurvey methodsWarning statements

Identifiers

PMID38238528
PMCPMC11335820
OpenAlexW4390964773

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.