Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38238516›Full record

Observational studyScientific reports2024

The use of information technology to improve interdisciplinary communication during infectious diseases ward rounds on the paediatric intensive care unit.

Jef Willems, Adeline Heyndrickx, Petra Schelstraete, Bram Gadeyne, Pieter De Cock, Stien Vandendriessche, Pieter Depuydt

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 99% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jef WillemsDepartment of Critical Care, Paediatric Intensive Care Unit, Ghent University Hospital, 1K12-D, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 9000, Ghent, Belgium. jef.willems@ugent.be.ORCID 0000-0001-8250-8964
Adeline HeyndrickxDepartment of Paediatrics, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Petra SchelstraeteDepartment of Paediatrics, Paediatric Pneumology and Infectious Diseases, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Bram GadeyneDepartment of Critical Care, Intensive Care Unit, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Pieter De CockDepartment of Pharmacy, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Stien VandendriesscheDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Medical Microbiology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Pieter DepuydtDepartment of Critical Care, Intensive Care Unit, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Ghent University Hospital · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prospective audit with feedback during infectious diseases ward rounds (IDWR) is a common antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) practice on the Paediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU). These interdisciplinary meetings rely on the quality of handover, with high risk of omission of information. We developed an electronic platform integrating infection-related patient data (COSARAPed). In the mixed PICU of a Belgian tertiary hospital we conducted an observational prospective cohort study comparing patient handovers during IDWRs using the COSARAPed-platform to those with access only to conventional resources. The quality of handover was investigated directly by assessment if the narrative was in accordance with Situation-Background-Assessment-Recommendation principles and if adequate demonstration of diagnostic information occurred, and also indirectly by registration if this was only achieved after intervention by the non-presenting AMS team members. We also recorded all AMS-recommendations. During a 6-month study period, 24 IDWRs and 82 patient presentations were assessed. We could only find a statistically significant advantage in favor of COSARAPed by indirect evaluation. We registered 92 AMS-recommendations, mainly resulting in reduced antibiotic pressure. We concluded that the IDWR is an appropriate platform for AMS on the PICU and that the utilisation of COSARAPed may enhance the quality of patient handover.

Indexed as

Communicable DiseasesInformation TechnologyChildCommunicationHumansIntensive Care Units, PediatricInterdisciplinary CommunicationProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID38238516
PMCPMC10796760
OpenAlexW4390971901

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.